MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

29 September 2007

Um, has everyone seen this? And is that really TPS and jonmc in the slide show?
It is. And I am the person from Essex, England mentioned too.
posted by essexjan 29 September | 08:24
Well I figured that part out :P I knew it was jonmc but I thought TPS had brown hair so I didn't think that was her. The Vegas pics gave me that impression...
posted by LunaticFringe 29 September | 08:32
I think the captioning is wrong in the slideshow.
posted by essexjan 29 September | 08:39
But how cool is it that Mefi (and thereby Mecha) were in the NYTimes? Oh wait...it's not cool, now we're mainstream :( This is the second time this week that something "geeky" about me has been featured in a widespread publication. World of Warcraft was featured in a review published in Science.
posted by LunaticFringe 29 September | 08:51
Grr. These NY Times folks have ruined the MeFi documentary. RUINED it.
posted by brina 29 September | 09:51
The article is shockingly dreadful, but it is still the height of awesome that DaShiv is now recongized internationally as the mad genius photog that he is!
posted by scody 29 September | 11:40
I think this is so awesome. The NY Times! I'm imagining it will drum up lots of business for DaShiv, which is fantastic for him.

Everyone looks beautiful!
posted by LoriFLA 29 September | 11:53
For the MetaChat record, the caption for the fifth picture actually belongs to the seventh and vice versa. Apparently, Judith Miller is now working on the NYT website.
posted by wendell 29 September | 11:57
Marvelous, simply marvelous. Not the article, but the attention given to DaShiv. I hope he comes to Chapel Hill soon. What would be the best way to lure him here, do you suppose? For that matter, how do I get any number of our mefi, metachat luminaries here? Here I go: I will feed you dinner if you come to Chapel Hill. As long as you are not an ax murderer, and have good table manners.
posted by msali 29 September | 12:52
... and you know what? DaShiv is that rare individual who can revel in this glory, profit from this exposure, and not let it go to his head.
posted by mischief 29 September | 13:03
Oops, spoke too soon:

Goodbye losers! I'm outta this mega-jackass metaplex!
posted by DaShiv at 10:51 AM on September 29

jk ;-P
posted by mischief 29 September | 13:05
{mad props to pips's ear, too}

btw, jonmc was championing Motorhead at the time of his photo. I was next to elizard.
posted by mischief 29 September | 13:18
Well-deserved exposure, I say. He's very talented and he knows his kit. He's patient, he always has the perfect lens for the environment and he's handy with an off-camera flash. He's probably also good at deleting his rubbish.

I hope he does really well from this. Weddings can be really hard and boring to shoot; he should be doing all portraiture.
posted by chuckdarwin 29 September | 13:19
Brina - no publicity is bad publicity! The doc will ride that train all the way to Sundance!
posted by SassHat 29 September | 13:25
btw, jonmc was championing Motorhead at the time of his photo. I was next to elizard.

Holy crap, mischief, that's right! So that'd be my shoulder playing opposite pips' ear as supporting cast. Heh.
posted by elizard 29 September | 13:33
Yep, elizard, I'd say your shoulder in the NYT beats (by a nose? heheh) my photo in Guitar World, which btw was taken by our very own BoringPostcards.
posted by mischief 29 September | 14:22
ibmcginty (in MeTalk) nailed the nebulous point for which I could not find the right words:

"jonmc's face as a link in the 'Fashion and Style' section of the New York Times"

Who better to represent the literate, fun-loving side of online discussion with an equally vital real-world counterpart?
posted by mischief 29 September | 14:36
But if DaShiv wants to make the big bucks, he needs to take pics at Gay Pride parades for Catholic websites...
posted by wendell 29 September | 16:47
Ya, I am in that slideshow, but not captioned correctly. And I honestly don't care enough to ask someone to correct it. The whole thing makes me slightly nervous for reasons I can't articulate, so the more veiled and confusing everything is, the better.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 29 September | 17:36
"jonmc's face as a link in the 'Fashion and Style' section of the New York Times"

This means I'm fashionable!

*explodes*

(and good for DaShive. he's mefi's photo hero just as ColdChef is the humor master.)
posted by jonmc 29 September | 18:44
I think this is quite cool.

The comments in the MeTa thread are very interesting.
posted by Miko 29 September | 19:17
Wowy wow wow.
posted by rainbaby 29 September | 22:13
I share your anxiety, TPS. And not just because of the privacy issues of having one's online persona suddenly intersect with one's real life.

It's kinda like when you find a favorite bar, and the food is good and the drinks are right and the music is the kind you like played neither too loudly nor too softly and the people are fun and then you read a review in the newspaper raving about how good the place is and you think, "Oh, no. There went that."

It's my hope that my analogy is specious: matamyntex is a helluva talented bouncer, and maybe all this really means is more revenue for the site. Hope so.
posted by BitterOldPunk 29 September | 23:11
I don't worry too much about the latter- it's not like the article made us sound particularly cool :-D
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 29 September | 23:33
Doesn't it still say Kate S on the front page (small inset photo)?
posted by chuckdarwin 30 September | 03:28
The whole thing makes me slightly nervous for reasons I can't articulate

I think I know what you mean, teeps. When I worked for the gov't and then for a local but nationally prominent university, I guarded my anonymity for a number of reasons. I didn't say anything that could get me fired, but I really didn't want my 'straight' life to intersect; I didn't want those people to know about this part of me. The one time I let it slip to a co-worker who I thought was sympatico, I deliberately gave her the wrong URL because this is my space. Now I live in an incredibly small community, and I wonder sometimes about how much I've let out, even though my real name ain't here. I have much less to lose, but I'd be rather uncomfortable if my image, username and photo were linked online, even though I've met many of you.
posted by elizard 30 September | 06:20
That is so fucking cool. Shitty article, though.
posted by dg 01 October | 17:46
rasnouq yadhtrib yppah || This just can't be good. It might force me to be away for a while.

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN