MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and
chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.
I used to work for a firm where one guy specialised in medical negligence, and he had a similar case, which had turned out somewhat badly for the patient because (somehow) his knob end had exploded.
The office was divided - on the initial telling (before we had time to really consider it and empathise) all the women thought it was hilarious whilst the men thought there wasn't enough money in the world to compensate him.
My first impression was how weird the whole thing is to begin with. Springs? To point it up and then down? What, like an umbrella? But on revision-poor guy. I can see how he'd end up a recluse.
It's a good thing Viagra came along before the post-9/11 security measures in airports. People used to get annoyed when they had to demonstrate the operation of their digital cameras for the security guards... THIS would be appalling.
I'm kind of surprised that the judge reduced the award, but so much information has been left out. Why did it misfunction? Bad mechanics in the product? Bad implantation? Or something the guy did that messed it up? This Pubmed abstract seems to indicate that the implant is/was pretty satisfactory.
At any rate, I think his lawyer was pretty much right: "I don't know any man who for any amount of money would want to trade and take my client's life."