Difference between revisions of "Talk:In-Jokes"

Revision as of 02:27, 9 January 2006

Is "Enlightenment" really an in-joke? If so, enlighten me. --Mudpuppie 14:21, 8 January 2006 (EST)

I think it was just ethylene being ethylene. --Matildaben 15:05, 8 January 2006 (EST)

"being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --iconomy 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST)

Shouldn't the in-joke be ethylene being ethylene, then, instead of enlightenment? Just asking. Can't figure out how to nix the entry. --Mudpuppie 16:06, 8 January 2006 (EST)

If you don't like it, just delete it. --Matildaben 16:26, 8 January 2006 (EST)

I don't think we plebes have that ability, do we? --Mudpuppie 16:37, 8 January 2006 (EST)

Nah, but you can just edit the page and delete the line that links to the page, I guess. --Matildaben 16:40, 8 January 2006 (EST)

Ah. Didn't think of that. It appears that I, too, am one of those WikIdiots. --Mudpuppie 16:43, 8 January 2006 (EST)

What about Snakes! On a Plane! - is that considered an in-joke? Or too broad? --iconomy 21:01, 8 January 2006 (EST)

I think that's a total in-joke, iconomy. Do it! --Mudpuppie 21:13, 8 January 2006 (EST)

DO IT

do it