Published, but unacknowledged I spent the last half of last year on a writing project and it was finally published :-) Because of policy reasons, I don't get acknowledged as author, but I guess I can take comfort in knowing that I did it :-(
→[More:]There's also a Web version
here, although I'm not very happy with the way that has been put together.
It's odd that, as someone who is a big fan of digital over print for reference material, I really like the feel of holding the print version (the .pdf is a version of the source for the 'proper' printed version).
The reason this is version 1.1 is that it was actually printed in a 'pre-press' version without the proper design and with some (oh, so many) typos and minor corrections needed. This was because we needed printed copies for a series of workshops we ran around the country in November and the set of standards it is written about were only finalised a couple of weeks before the workshops, way too late to meet design and printing deadlines.
Although I couldn't be 'officially' listed as the author, my boss publicly praised the work I had done in creating the guide at all the workshops, which was pretty cool.