Comment Feed:
♦ RSS
I'm convinced that swearing hangs on because A) it's a useful part of speech, B) legacy, but also C) to teach children about "register". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Register_(sociolinguistics)
I think modern parents by and large realize that there's nothing wrong with the words themselves as there is the context in which they're said. It's not like kids don't learn these words; they're almost guaranteed to by the nature of their forbidden-ness. I think that that's exactly the point, though; for kids to learn these words, but also to learn when NOT to use them. The only people kids are going to get in trouble for swearing in front of already know the words; it's not about forbidding the knowledge and spread of them. But in the same sense that it can be considered "low," "common," or "vulgar" (and remember the origin of the word "vulgar"; it was the speech of the common person not educated in formal Latin), it's to teach children that how you speak is as important as what you speak. That one should speak to members of a social class one aspires to in the manner of that social class.
I'm no prude about profanity, but it's harsh on the ears, especially when you're just lying on the beach reading or in the grocery store or whatever.
"That song makes me wonder why people always talk about Wilco losing their edge. We've always been [sissies]."
a loud, excited voice yelled into a mic a brief introduction — so brief the longest part of it was the polysyllabic participle between the words “Big” and “Freedia.”
in a signature dance whose name is sometimes helpfully shortened to “p-popping.”
led them in a chant that made “Katrina” and “FEMA” into rhyming objects of the same obscene verb.
well that's a certain bonding you don't find everyday, and everyone is all chortling inside and secretly tickled to death.