Gay man elected homecoming queen at George Mason University. →[More:]
First off, I think the tradition of homecoming queen/prom queen/etc. is silly and out-dated, but I know that some folks still get into it, so hey, whatever, no harm done.
So George Mason U elects a gay man (or, rather, his drag queen alter ego) as homecoming queen. I'm fine with that.
But if he weren't gay, and if he were just some frat boy dressing up as a girl for a larf, and then he was elected -- I'd be pissed off.
So what's the difference? Why is it acceptable (inasmuch as it *is* acceptable) for gay men to dress up as women, while it's offensive buffoonery for straight man to do it?
Only thing I can come up with is that gay men, generally, are trying to emulate grace and glamour, while the jokey straight version is, somehow, making fun of some other elements of women playing dress-up.
But I can't articulate it well. Help me. Is it a double standard? What's the difference?