So I was wondering, as I ducked out of this rainstorm into a coffee place on my way home, and glanced at a newspaper
→[More:] which had a little sidebar about some guy who was nabbed for being a serial flasher on the bike path.
I shared the "what a creep" sentiment of the story, then as I went back into the rain on my walk to work, thought about the difference between male and female flashers.
I mean the whole
context is different. Male flashers are usually alone, and flash women in situations in which the two are alone. Female flashers, at least from what I have seen, do it more "socially," meaning that they are with a group, and they probably show the wares to a group of men.
Then there is the whole "consequence" thing. Men are prosecuted, women are hooted.
I am not disagreeing with any of the status quo in this. I assume it's evolved as an outcome of the usual discrepancy in power between the sexes.
But it was interesting to ponder as I was trying to avoid puddles and fallen branches.
(As they say on talk radio. . .)
I'm out.