It describes how I feel about intellectual property rather nicely.

The instant a work is published, it already is splitting off and propagating and reproducing and mutating - and being derived from by its very consumption.

But as a "work", the instant it is published it is already stale, history in the past.

And that "works" inherently can't be copied, because in creating the work, the creator evolves, preparing the creator for the next creation, which should surpass the previous creation.

And the futility of attempting to stifle and freeze creations and creativity in time, especially for disproportional profit and exploitation - but perhaps only if we do not limit or otherwise legislate the sources of inspiration and derivation.

Nice one. I like the metaphors.

Wait, it's your comment? At least it could have been someone else's remixed. (Nice comment.)

I'd say loquacious is an apt moniker for you. :D I kid because I love.

It's a great comment. But still; when I write something for publication, if someone wants to republish it verbatim in another newspaper or magazine, they really need to cross my palm with silver. They're not remixing or being changed in the creation.

are you available for collaboration? great wordsmithing, mr. loquacious. really, truly outstanding work.

Whatcha got in mind, fake? Email me.

I make no promises to perfomance on demand, but the right instigations set me rolling.

Loq, this is my favorite post of yours (also the stynxno comment).