MetaChat - Is it wrong that I just read the headline "Naval sex cases rarely tried"

MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.

18 March 2006

Is it wrong that I just read the headline "Naval sex cases rarely tried" and, well, didn't think of the navy?

post by: occhiblu at: 02:27 | 8 comments

nope--it makes more sense the navel way--they're too small. (unless they're selling special cases and apparatus now?)

posted by amberglow 18 March | 02:34

All due respect to amberglow: Yes, occhiblu, that is very, very wrong.

posted by mudpuppie 18 March | 02:40

It would probably be less embarassing if you said you heard it that way rather than having read it that way.

posted by Eideteker 18 March | 02:59

We got a case of naval sex sent to us one Christmas, but we couldn't try it because the package was damaged during shipping.

posted by Slack-a-gogo 18 March | 09:16

I prefer the mandarin sex.

posted by matildaben 18 March | 12:39

I'm just gonna blame TPS's belly-button piercing story and shift the shame.

posted by occhiblu 18 March | 12:46

If you're feeling risque, and have some lube handy, I'd recommend nasal sex. Don't knock it 'till you've tried it!

posted by pieisexactlythree 18 March | 13:33

Ew.

posted by mudpuppie 18 March | 14:43

← When senators bite back. || OMG...bunny →

HOME || REGISTER || LOGIN