MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

07 February 2006

SFW?
posted by Capn 07 February | 16:58
This is my big gripe about movies today. They suck, largely due to cgi. For example, the new star wars would have been a lot better if they used the same techniques that they used on the first ones.
posted by puke & cry 07 February | 16:59
Yeah, SFW.

The actual set of the film only used 700 sheep, partly because of Canada’s comedic concern for the spreading of American diseases to their sheep.

Why is it comedic? Are our sheep really that pristine? Are they... non-comedogenic?
posted by Specklet 07 February | 17:10
lots of things are non-comedogenic if you don't rub them on your face.
posted by puke & cry 07 February | 18:05
CGI sheep in a gay love story. There's a joke in there somewhere but damned if I can find it.
posted by mischief 07 February | 18:55
I'm *floored* - I had no idea they had a SFX budget on that movie. I'll have to go and watch it again to find the CGI sheep, although I bet it was mostly digital compositing.
posted by ooga_booga 07 February | 19:12
Directors to CGI: "Why can't I quit you?"
posted by sourwookie 07 February | 21:06
I KNEW IT. I totally called that, and my friend was like, "sheep? why fake sheep?"

/smug
posted by unknowncommand 07 February | 22:49
What is your favorite local site(s)? || Goddamn Temp Agency Crap!

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN