MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

05 January 2006

Publishers toss Booker winners into the reject pile "They can’t judge a book without its cover. Publishers and agents have rejected two Booker prize-winning novels submitted as works by aspiring authors."
That's why you need an agent.
posted by delmoi 05 January | 00:10
Hmm, well, they were submitting books written 30 years ago. I can see how something daring and original in the 70's would seem old hat today.
posted by agropyron 05 January | 00:12
True: and besides, I could never read Naipaul, despite everybody raving about him. Also I think the booker prize winner ooks are in reality a list of books to avoid. Especially Life of Pi or (gasp) God of small things.
posted by dhruva 05 January | 00:15
i really liked life of pi.
posted by amberglow 05 January | 00:23
ah well :)
posted by dhruva 05 January | 00:25
I'm trying to read Life of Pi right now, because a friend really wants me to. I'm finding it difficult to get into.
posted by agropyron 05 January | 00:26
*fires up Bookster*
posted by stilicho 05 January | 00:56
Oh dhruva, blessed relief to find I'm not the only one left out in the cold by God of Small Things.

As for the Bookers and most other book prizes, I find I am bored silly by a great deal of what comes with an official "great" sticker on the cover. It's glib to automatically assume the fault lies with the agents.
posted by melissa may 05 January | 02:39
This really is kind of bullshit.

The exercise by The Sunday Times draws attention to concerns that the industry has become incapable of spotting genuine literary talent.


I hate this fake journalism, manufacturing controversy and raising shit where there is none. And the quotes from Naipaul and Middleton at the end certainly make them sound like crotchety and bitter has-beens.
posted by kyleg 05 January | 03:18
Slush piles are a combination of a sort of bulletin board from a free mental health clinic in 1970's Haight-Ashbery and the diary of a failed middle aged actor right after losing the lead in summer stock Our Town.

There is certainly the possibility that something good could be in there, but the chances of finding it are really slim. On any given day we get in 3 or 4 DSM-IV mortal lock schizo cases describing in detail how adept Ronald Reagan was with a double headed dildo or how the lizard men are in the TV again and three memiors of dudes who were in the Merchant Marine during the Korean war. Pepppered with that are one or two systemic analyses of world events and how it's all the fault of the Jews as written by retired machinists from Michigan (pretty much always Michigan, sometimes Ohio), Vampire Erotica (lots of this) and one or two that are written on typewriters and basically encrypted.

The mental health crisis in this country is pretty scary.

Anyway, really the sheer volume of the submissions make it hard for things to bob to the surface. This is really the point of having an agent, a good one will fight for you and perhaps nudge your deal up there, but even a bad one (expect a pay for play one, never pay them up front) gets your submission under the nose of someone who is going to look at it.
posted by Divine_Wino 05 January | 10:01
i haven't shaved in four days || Gluteus maximus

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN