Difference between revisions of "Talk:IRC Channels"
From Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dodgy was good enough to set up #wererabbits for us. Seems like there was a consensus decision to use #bunnies instead. To keep things from appearing fractured and/or confusing, does anyone have any objection to removing the #wererabbits info? If other channels pop up in the future (and let us all hope it doesn't come to that), we can add the info then. Any thoughts? --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 20:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | Dodgy was good enough to set up #wererabbits for us. Seems like there was a consensus decision to use #bunnies instead. To keep things from appearing fractured and/or confusing, does anyone have any objection to removing the #wererabbits info? If other channels pop up in the future (and let us all hope it doesn't come to that), we can add the info then. Any thoughts? --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 20:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm thinking we can delete #wererabbits but I'd ask dodgy first. --[[User:Eideteker|Eideteker]] 20:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:17, 25 March 2006
When things are set and decided, perhaps someone can create a table with the ops contact information (IM/e-mail) if we all want to do that.
Dodgy was good enough to set up #wererabbits for us. Seems like there was a consensus decision to use #bunnies instead. To keep things from appearing fractured and/or confusing, does anyone have any objection to removing the #wererabbits info? If other channels pop up in the future (and let us all hope it doesn't come to that), we can add the info then. Any thoughts? --Mudpuppie 20:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm thinking we can delete #wererabbits but I'd ask dodgy first. --Eideteker 20:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
