Difference between revisions of "Talk:In-Jokes"
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST) | "being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shouldn't the in-joke be ethylene being ethylene, then, instead of enlightenment? Just asking. Can't figure out how to nix the entry. --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 16:06, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you don't like it, just delete it. --[[User:Matildaben|Matildaben]] 16:26, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think we plebes have that ability, do we? --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 16:37, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nah, but you can just edit the page and delete the line that links to the page, I guess. --[[User:Matildaben|Matildaben]] 16:40, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah. Didn't think of that. It appears that I, too, am one of those [[WikIdiots]]. --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 16:43, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What about Snakes! On a Plane! - is that considered an in-joke? Or too broad? --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 21:01, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think that's a total in-joke, iconomy. Do it! --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 21:13, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == DO IT == | ||
| + | |||
| + | do it | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks, I did, with a little help from eideteker! The WikIdiot strikes again. --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 21:38, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should the "in ur base" meme be added here, or is it too widely spread to be an in-joke? | ||
Latest revision as of 22:05, 25 October 2006
Is "Enlightenment" really an in-joke? If so, enlighten me. --Mudpuppie 14:21, 8 January 2006 (EST)
I think it was just ethylene being ethylene. --Matildaben 15:05, 8 January 2006 (EST)
"being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --iconomy 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST)
Shouldn't the in-joke be ethylene being ethylene, then, instead of enlightenment? Just asking. Can't figure out how to nix the entry. --Mudpuppie 16:06, 8 January 2006 (EST)
If you don't like it, just delete it. --Matildaben 16:26, 8 January 2006 (EST)
I don't think we plebes have that ability, do we? --Mudpuppie 16:37, 8 January 2006 (EST)
Nah, but you can just edit the page and delete the line that links to the page, I guess. --Matildaben 16:40, 8 January 2006 (EST)
Ah. Didn't think of that. It appears that I, too, am one of those WikIdiots. --Mudpuppie 16:43, 8 January 2006 (EST)
What about Snakes! On a Plane! - is that considered an in-joke? Or too broad? --iconomy 21:01, 8 January 2006 (EST)
I think that's a total in-joke, iconomy. Do it! --Mudpuppie 21:13, 8 January 2006 (EST)
DO IT
do it
Thanks, I did, with a little help from eideteker! The WikIdiot strikes again. --iconomy 21:38, 8 January 2006 (EST)
Should the "in ur base" meme be added here, or is it too widely spread to be an in-joke?
