Difference between revisions of "Talk:In-Jokes"
From Wiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST) | "being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --[[User:iconomy|iconomy]] 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shouldn't the in-joke be ethylene being ethylene, then, instead of enlightenment? Just asking. Can't figure out how to nix the entry. --[[User:Mudpuppie|Mudpuppie]] 16:06, 8 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 8 January 2006
Is "Enlightenment" really an in-joke? If so, enlighten me. --Mudpuppie 14:21, 8 January 2006 (EST)
I think it was just ethylene being ethylene. --Matildaben 15:05, 8 January 2006 (EST)
"being ethylene" - wasn't that the name of a really strange cult movie? --iconomy 15:37, 8 January 2006 (EST)
Shouldn't the in-joke be ethylene being ethylene, then, instead of enlightenment? Just asking. Can't figure out how to nix the entry. --Mudpuppie 16:06, 8 January 2006 (EST)
