Huh, the experiment was so completely not what I thought it was. How it looked to me:

1) Quiz to find out what I care about with respect to cameras

2) Three cameras that differ only in one of the ways I said I didn't care about, in my case, colour. So I picked the blue one first, because that's my favorite colour and I thought they were all identical otherwise.

3) Final two cameras, one of which was the one I selected in (2) above, and the other was recognized brand name instead of one I've never heard of, but in my least preferred colour.

I figured you were testing to see if, even though I said I didn't care about colour, that I actually chose based on that over technical differences or brand recognition. It sounds like the 3 cameras shown initially actually weren't identical apart from colour, though?

I can't see the graphs, because they are blocked by the work filter, as is most of your site :-(

But you're welcome - glad to help.

Awesome!

Yes, we are rationalizing animals. I can't remember what my theory was any more, but I do know that it was wrong. (Too many deadlines, not enough sleep).

I would pick a bright red camera so I could find it in a hurry. Happy to help; I hope you get a good grade!

Niiiice. I should have intuited that it was specifically about priming, only because I've been thinking a lot about priming as it is used by various political and charitable groups I belong to.

But I didn't guess it was about priming, so go you!

I didn't pick up that it was priming either. I thought it was a check on the strength of brand appeal. Interesting, thanks.