MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

27 January 2010

That looks fabulous, but can I get any work done on it? What sort of word processing capabilities will it have? How much is it going to cost?
posted by msali 27 January | 13:58
Jobs says typing on it is "a dream". I remain skeptical.

At least the "iBooks" part uses ePub rather than some locked-down Apple nonsense.
posted by Joe Beese 27 January | 14:02
Woo! It's a really big iPhone.
posted by octothorpe 27 January | 14:04
Have they figured out how to do Smell-o-Vision yet? Because that would really impress me.
posted by Atom Eyes 27 January | 14:06
Now, if this thing can do video calls and maybe hook up a BT keyboard, I'm sold.
posted by MonkeyButter 27 January | 14:11
How much is it going to cost?

That's what I want to know!
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 27 January | 14:12
I'm getting a real Diamond Age "Young Lady's Companion" vibe from this
posted by The Whelk 27 January | 14:12
unlocked...nice
posted by MonkeyButter 27 January | 14:17
Starting at $499, WiFi only.
posted by eamondaly 27 January | 14:26
It's going to cost $999 for the fanciest version and 499 for the cheapest. I wonder if you get a free NYTimes subscription with it.
posted by Obscure Reference 27 January | 14:27
I just can't get over how much I dislike the name.
posted by richat 27 January | 15:19
Apple's only wanted to unveil this product for, what, two decades?A functional tablet seems to have been their goal for a long time.

Personally...love the idea, price seems about right but the storage makes me pause. 1/10th the size of my iPod?
posted by graymouser 27 January | 15:39
richat: I can't either. I'm not usually one for crude humor, but many many of the feminine hygiene product cracks I have seen have had me snarfing coffee (such as "So will iffy Wifi coverage be called iSpotting?"). And then there's the "no, not the iPOD, hand me my IPAD" thing. I'm not even sure what Mac products are all i-anything, anyway, and this just seems to be perpetuating it awkwardly.
posted by crush-onastick 27 January | 15:41
I'm loving today's Daily Nail.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 27 January | 15:50
Have they figured out how to do Smell-o-Vision yet? Because that would really impress me

I think they tried that several years ago. They were called snortals.
posted by Melismata 27 January | 16:03
This thread is incredible in its level of sanity.
posted by drezdn 27 January | 16:15
Also, I'm shocked that some tablet computer maker hasn't worked a Hitchhiker's guide crossover somehow.
posted by drezdn 27 January | 16:16
This thread is incredible in its level of sanity.

Unlike the thread in a certain other meta-prefixed website.
posted by octothorpe 27 January | 16:36
As I'm typing to you on one of these (that I got for a little over a grand) it's hard for me to get excited about the iPad. Or to even see it as groundbreaking in any way whatsoever.

3.5 lbs, multi-touch and stylus, portrait view, and a real processor = Happy me. It's not a slate but keeps me able to have perspective on when slates will actually be worth buying.
posted by birdie 27 January | 17:42
Yeah, I'm a mac user and an iphone user and this doesn't really open any doors for me. For the price of the high end one you could get a macbook that will out perform the pad in most if not all respects (the macbook is heavier and lacks the wow factor, but it play DVDs and connect to other hardware). The "apple approved" applications only thing is ok for a phone, but for a computer it's just lame.
posted by doctor_negative 27 January | 18:29
I have to say it didn't really tickle my Want bone.

For $500, I could get a laptop with a 17" screen and a 160GB hard drive - and I could run any damned program on it that I want. And - here's a revolutionary advance for you - it would let me do more than one thing at the same time.
posted by Joe Beese 27 January | 18:38
Have they figured out how to do Smell-o-Vision yet?
If you scratch over my screen name, you'll get a faint whiff of wet dog.
posted by Wolfdog 27 January | 19:00
Typing? Not stylus/pen input? Ugh.
posted by Eideteker 27 January | 20:14
Not stylus/pen input?

1994 called. They want their shiny new technology back.
posted by special-k 27 January | 20:19
No stylus/pen input, no multitasking, no Flash on web pages. Big dud if ya ask me.
posted by MonkeyButter 27 January | 20:35
That's a ton of new.
posted by dhartung 27 January | 23:18
The "apple approved" applications only thing is ok for a phone, but for a computer it's just lame.

I think the point is that it's not a computer and it's not supposed to compete with computers. Not even Apple can build a tablet that is as good as a real computer. This thing looks a lot more like an e-reader killer: the cheapest version is basically the same price as a Kindle DX, but it has a color screen and can play music and video, and run tons of apps to boot. As an entertainment device, it should be a lot more appealing than a netbook, as it's supposedly not as sluggish and awkward as your typical netbook is. No multitasking = fail, though.
posted by Daniel Charms 28 January | 06:51
I said this in the Mefi thread but I hate the way that Apple products are so tied to your desktop/laptop. You still have to plug this thing into your computer and sync it with iTunes as if it where 1998 and you were syncing a Palm. The thing should be a first class device not an accessory to your desktop.
posted by octothorpe 28 January | 10:41
That's what makes Apple the Microsoft it's okay to love.
posted by Hugh Janus 28 January | 10:47
I can't help but think something called iPad should have to with feminine hygeine.
posted by Miko 28 January | 12:49
On further thought: I really want to like this, but it has so many damn strikes against it - it's just not a real computer. But OTOH I want to see it succeed, because I want something like this, but for real. Technology has been moving toward a device which integrates screen and input device, that squares the circle between a portable computer and a PDA. It's almost like Apple wanted to create that but it then gave up and said, "Let's just put out a big honkin' iPhone that you can't make calls on and see if people buy it." My fear is that it flops and scares off anybody from coming up with a good product in the same space.

For my money...I can't get over the small drive space. My iPod is 10x bigger than this, and that's half the size of either of my external drives. Between that and the "only runs Apple approved apps one at a time"...I don't think I could go for this.
posted by graymouser 28 January | 13:21
Stunt Release.
posted by Lipstick Thespian 28 January | 13:51
TWO AND A HALF MEN -- Two restraining orders and a hit man || F#ck Buttons -- "Lisbon Maru" (band name mildly NSFW)

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN