MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

25 March 2009

Vajeanas!

I'll get my coat.
posted by middleclasstool 25 March | 20:24
Fabulous!!
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 25 March | 20:27
Those would look so much better with a raging pubic hair bush climbing out of the bikini bottoms. I mean...if you're going to give it all away, make it count.
posted by ColdChef 25 March | 20:39
Not only does that look tres tawdry, it also looks danged uncomfy. Ick.

And we will either see Britney or Madonna in a pair before the month is out, I'm betting.
posted by bunnyfire 25 March | 20:41
Imagine if they became popular and all the muffin-tops we had to endure. Blah!
posted by MonkeyButter 25 March | 20:42
Those would look so much better with a raging pubic hair bush climbing out of the bikini bottoms.

"Hey, is that Don King in your pants or are you just glad to see me?"
posted by jonmc 25 March | 20:51
This could give rise to the "ironic merkin" style demographic.
posted by middleclasstool 25 March | 21:01
Other views here.

They're good for stripper wear, I suppose. Or, for outrageous nightlife. I wouldn't want to see these in daylight.
posted by LoriFLA 25 March | 21:04
Just the thing to show off my tramp stamp!
posted by deborah 25 March | 22:16
what the fucking fuck
posted by desjardins 25 March | 22:34
PS: get off my lawn
posted by desjardins 25 March | 22:37
"see Britney or Madonna in a pair before the month is out, I'm betting"
No. Please no.
posted by arse_hat 25 March | 23:03
Wow, in LoriFLA's link the photoshopping on the straight-on view (the second image) is INSANE!
Look at how from behind, the girl has hips and a waist, but from the front she is just one flat panel.

Also, I know the bikini is supposed to hold the jeans up, but don't you think the jean part would just still fall under your cheeks and get lodged there separate from the bikini?
posted by rmless2 25 March | 23:12
Oh, those leave plenty to the imagination, really. Like, I'm imagining right now how a curvaceous anthropomorphic sex badger would look in them....

Did I say something wrong?
posted by Hugh Janus 25 March | 23:40
Those are about 2" from being denim hose.
posted by trinity8-director 25 March | 23:41
Yeah, there's no pubic hair showing because it's Brazilian, yo.

I keep thinking "belt and suspenders"

Did um, anyone else have this on the order page?

≡ Click to see image ≡
posted by lysdexic 26 March | 01:24
I do not like them.
posted by Meatbomb 26 March | 06:22
LOL desjardins

those look like seriously high maintenance garments. While one is wearing them, I mean. that would drive me nuts to have them neither on nor off. pick one already.
posted by chewatadistance 26 March | 07:14
Those aren't jeans; they're leggings.
posted by theora55 26 March | 11:42
this is a funny post, y'all kill me. srsly.
posted by theora55 26 March | 11:43
They go to hip size 94? My eyes! My eyes!
posted by essexjan 26 March | 15:58
Hip sizes 82, 88, and 94 are out of stock, so they're clearly in great demand.
posted by lukemeister 26 March | 17:24
They're just silly. How would people not giggle at someone wearing them?
posted by pompomtom 26 March | 17:32
pompomtom,

I have the same reaction to most of the outfits on Dancing with the Stars.
posted by lukemeister 26 March | 17:55
I don't think the problem is giggling. I think the problem is jiggling.

posted by lysdexic 26 March | 17:55
Personally, I *like* leaving a little to the imagination. I don't want to see what you've got. If I really want to know I can imagine it!
posted by Doohickie 26 March | 21:05
Wow. Check out her wittle ittle eyebrows. || Bunny? Nice bunny?

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN