MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and
chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.
29 July 2008
I was reading this story in a paper somebody left lying around and for the life of me, my first thought was 'why, of all places, would somebody have a commune on Staten Island?'
Heh. Miko, I'll assume you've been to Staten Island. This is like forming a commune in fucking Paramus. It's the type of place people form communes to get away from.
Joking aside, I think there are some quite different conceptions of what a commune is or should be depending on where they are and who joins them. Most communes are not really "peace out, bro" hippie retreats -- the successful and long-lived ones, anyway.
The recent obit for Kat Kinkade, founder of the Virginia commune Twin Oaks, speaks of the tensions between idealists and pragmatists that bedevil many intentional communities. Some urban communes have failed the test and either collapsed outright or evolved into something more like cohousing (aka "commune lite").
GANAS says right on its front page that many of its members are professionals who work in Manhattan. For them obviously it's a shot at the best of both worlds.
Oh, come on. The whole best of both worlds part is what makes it sound like a pretty good idea, at least on paper. City folks have a much smaller environmental footprint than rural folks anyway.
Is Staten Island really that bad? Seemed like any other piece of suburbia speckled with good and bad neighborhoods to me, but at least the mass transit is pretty good. Who cares if your neighbors are a bunch of "guidos and blonds" if you've got your cult to hang with when you get home?
Is is really so hard to make an intentional community without running up against that "Hell is other people" problem? And the invasive super truth "feedback learning" shit? And the slacker hippies? THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS.