MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

21 April 2008

LOL thomas friedman
posted by mullacc 21 April | 15:35
There are a couple of odd candidates. Friedman for one, and also Christopher Hitchens. There are a few candidates who are certainly intellectually important, but haven't really had much public impact, and a handful who are hugely well-known, but aren't particularly intellectual. But all things considered I think it's not a bad list.

I found it really hard to narrow it down to 5, but in the end, I went for Pope Benedict XVI, Amartya Sen, Richard Dawkins, Jared Diamond and Aitzaz Ahsan.
posted by matthewr 21 April | 16:01
This just makes me think of People magazine. Who is the "Britney Spears" of the intellectual world?
posted by DarkForest 21 April | 16:15
Their list is missing quite a few intellectual luminaries. Luckily, I was able to write in George W. Bush.
posted by spork 21 April | 16:16
Oh absolutely, DarkForest. But lists are always fun, and academics love them just as much as anyone else.
posted by matthewr 21 April | 16:23
...and also Christopher Hitchens.

I'm conflicted on Hitchens. Before he went nuts over the Iraq war, I thought he was a really interesting and provocative writer. Though I'm certainly biased since he was one of the first "intellectuals" that I came across as a young college student just starting to explore. Though I did happen to read his short Jefferson biography recently, which I enjoyed.

Friedman just annoys me. But I really shouldn't snark since I don't recognize a good number of these people.

posted by mullacc 21 April | 16:25
I don't feel qualified to respond. I counted, and hell, I only knew 34 of their names, and of those 34, I am familiar with the work of perhaps 25. One-fourth of an educated opinion does not an opinion make.
posted by msali 21 April | 16:29
True, I had to look at the bios for a lot of the non-American, non-European ones.
posted by matthewr 21 April | 16:32
I didn't know who a lot of them were. I guess I'm just out of it. I'd probably pick Gore and Peter Singer, not that I really know that much about their intellectual achievements, but I like what they seem to stand for. Gladwell? I liked his books and his smirky author photos, but I'm not sure that makes him a top intellectual. Why not David Byrne or Douglas Hofstadter?
posted by DarkForest 21 April | 16:32
bjorn lomborg? really?

that was harder than I expected. I voted for Sen, Benedict XVI, Yunus, Al Gore (based on the 'shaping public discourse in an important way' criteria, although I wonder how he's viewed outside of the United States), and I honestly can't remember the last two; it was either Habermas and Zizek, or Sachs and Easterly (who probably cancel each other out).

and I agree that Friedman is sort of a tool.
posted by dismas 21 April | 16:37
okay, gore is clearly respected enough to win the Nobel Peace Prize. I guess I was thinking about how in the US, he gets used as a sort of jokey target by people who deny global warming, and I was curious as to whether he's viewed the same way elsewhere
posted by dismas 21 April | 16:44
Lee Kwan Yew seemed like the weirdest one to me. I wrote in Duncan Black (Atrios). You should too!

I guess to be hip I should have written in Stephen Colbert.

Or Rick Astley.
posted by ibmcginty 21 April | 19:36
I voted for Chomsky, Judt, Venter, Qadawi and Yunus.

It's just yet another right wing v. left wing compo really :)

(chomsky's gonna win it, GO BOSTON!)
posted by By the Grace of God 22 April | 03:40
ooo, zizek was on there? Missed that. I love me some Zizek.
posted by By the Grace of God 22 April | 03:41
Is it 5 o'clock yet? || I'M PISSED.

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN