MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

20 January 2008

At what number of sock puppets can you assume a user is a little loopy? [More:] So hey, sock puppets. Yeah I've got some on my site. Some were hiding behind sock puppets to rag about their own companies work, which was pretty funny. Some to just be funny with their sock puppet name. Some got bored with their old name and decided to get a new one. Some are the classic "new guy backs that other guys point up", but clearly they're the same guy. Mostly harmless, nothing too exiting. Except now, when I've had a feeling that some people sounded similar and now when I bothered to check, find that one guy has seven different logins. Three of which have actually argued with each other. At what point should I get creeped out?

yes, I considered posting this under a sock puppet.
When they're having arguments, that's when it's nuts.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 20 January | 18:48
Three of which have actually argued with each other

There's a Doctoral Thesis, right there. Oysh!
posted by MonkeyButter 20 January | 19:06
You might want to send the user a little email...

Hey, did you check using IP addresses? Isn't it possible that they're actually several different people behind the same router? Say, on a college campus or at work? I don't know how this IP thing works...
posted by muddgirl 20 January | 19:09
I've not used sock puppets (or have I?) in forum situations. I am guilty of using them in online game matches.

In the old Microsoft Game Zone where LucasArts' X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter and X-Wing Alliance games networked, I used aliases. The dastardly thing about doing that then is that a new alias/member that had no games under his/her belt (who actually had "Jedi"-level rank/skills/experience) could frak with opponents' ranks when they lost to the alleged newbie.

My ex-husband and I were in clans (otherwise known as guilds) and saw other folks hosting games, booting (disconnecting) pilots they knew they couldn't beat, and picking on fresh meat. I never went so far as to join an opposing clan for espionage purposes. Any game host with a modicum of networking knowledge could figure out IPs from the then-prevalent dial-up connections.

Same story with multiplayer Soldier of Fortune, iterations of Quake, UT, UT2K4, and Elite Forces. Not that we were gaming badasses, but logging into a free-for-all game and having it turn into a 1-person-versus-the-rest-of-the-clients spawnfrag fest got old. Eventually, ex-husband and I had two computers in the same room, but we didn't communicate about the game other than shouts of joy or dismay and certainly didn't team up. We were too busy fraggin' and listening to our respective choices of frag-worthy music.
posted by bonobo 20 January | 19:11
arguing with yourself is nuts.
posted by shane 20 January | 19:53
arguing with yourself is nuts.

is not. shut up, dumbface.
posted by shane 20 January | 19:54
It depends on if their little skits are entertaining.
If it reads like bad exposition to try and make up for bad storytelling, or a poorly couched agenda, well, that's just creepy bad craftsmanship. Give 'em the hook.
posted by ethylene 20 January | 20:13
if number of sockpuppets is greater than number of windows at puppetmaster's house, then loopy
posted by jason's_planet 20 January | 20:54
Amateurs!
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson 20 January | 21:31
I've got a friend who's got at last count nine separate web accounts, albeit in different places. She does have arguments with herself, but that's just her way of working things out in her head. She'll clearly mark which "person" is speaking, and the person at site A doesn't go stalking the person at site B.

If that's the kind of thing going on (pseudo-stalking), then yeah, nuts. Otherwise it's bad performance art.
posted by lysdexic 20 January | 21:48
When someone creates one connected to a post made several months previously about an incident which occurred six years ago.
posted by brujita 21 January | 01:24
heh, has that happened brujita?

I'm a little wigged out, as I often get chatty in emails with members (they submit their work, we end up emailing a lot), and this case is no exception, so I'm feeling a little had at the moment since only one of the personas has spoken to me via email. I could have made at least seven new friends dammit!
posted by dabitch 21 January | 02:08
oh and I've been that fresh meat bonobo describes so thank you for not doing that!
posted by dabitch 21 January | 02:09
Hmm, imaginary friends of the online variety...

I believe my muse just swooned.
Silly muse.
posted by Ardiril 21 January | 04:50
Sockpuppet or no, I will find you.
posted by Pips 21 January | 11:19
EEEEEEP!

Yeah, I dunno. I guess my site attracts a lot of strange people. ;P Then again, this is teh intarwebs.
posted by dabitch 22 January | 03:31
When nano-wires explode. || Storyline Opps (Possible Spoilers)

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN