MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

19 January 2008

What is so great about this person, exactly? She just seems like she's competing with Britney for most fucked up, to me.
And then there's this little tidbit.
posted by chewatadistance 19 January | 12:20
I don't know about great, but she was pretty funny on Never Mind the Buzzcocks (a comedy pop quiz) a while back, so she's not entirely charmless and vacuous.
posted by matthewr 19 January | 12:29
chewie, I'll likely get piled-on for this, but 'tis my opinion that she has/had much more talent than Britney to begin with. Not that her meltdown is any less egregious for the press to focus on, or anything, nor does she deserve the attention for being a royal fuckup, but, well... I think in my perception it's a bigger waste. Britney's only talent was that she has, or used to have, a knack for finding great producers / writers.

If Britney had kept her shit together she likely would have been this generation's Madonna. Madonna was never a fantastic singer but she's a genius at knowing how to put together a catchy, appealing act, and work the media and public opinion in her favour.

Amy Winehouse - dunno, I feel like she is more along the lines of a Tori Amos (is that right?).
posted by lonefrontranger 19 January | 12:51
It's not like I'm a fan, but Britney, at least at her best, is/was a fairly talented dancer/performer/'entertainer.' Don't get me wrong--she's not a singer, or a songwriter, or an actor, or anything even remotely resembling any of those things.

If pressed, I'm a slightly bigger fan of Winehouse's, because she plays with the Dap-Kings, and gets Ghostface and Pharoahe Monch to appear on her remixes. But, at their best anyway, I think Britney is probably more talented.
posted by box 19 January | 13:19
that's a fair assessment, box. I forgot to include that whole dancing/performance/entertainment factor equation in my assessment of "talent", which was not fair.

I tend to (rightly or wrongly so) be very biassed towards a singer's vocal talent / abilities / quality, which is why I've never been able to stomach acts like Dylan, Springsteen, Tom Petty, Neutral Milk Hotel, et. al. 'tis all like nails-on-a-chalkboard to me, unfortunately, and it totally occludes my ability to focus on the instrumental / compositional / lyrical talent. At all.

It took me awhile, and a lot of work by the mister, to get me cottoned onto the Decemberists, because despite how catchy and adorable they really are (and they are really catchy) Conor Oberst sounds like a muppet, end of story.
posted by lonefrontranger 19 January | 13:36
Her music is pretty fun. Sad to see her struggle with an addiction like this. Although I wonder if seeing people struggle with addition so openly in the public eye could be a lesson for others? Not sure, but perhaps.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 19 January | 13:45
Drug addiction is hardly new to the entertainment circuit, but today, celebrity addiction is more public. Whereas once trashing a hotel room barely got a mention in the rock press, now every vice is a potential headline on ET.
posted by Ardiril 19 January | 16:18
I think Britney is probably more talented.
I politely disagree.
posted by CitrusFreak12 19 January | 16:27
I can dig it. Modern pop music has a similar problem, I think, to big-budget movies, where it's such a collaborative medium that it's sometimes really hard to isolate one person's contributions. That, or I overrate Britney's talent because people keep telling me (well, or they used to--what was that, like, eight years ago?) what a great dancer/performer/entertainer she is, and, frankly, I'm not really an expert in that kind of stuff, so I'm likely to put a lot of weight on other, more knowledgeable opinions.
posted by box 19 January | 16:33
lonefrontranger - Conor Oberst is in Bright Eyes. Are you thinking of Colin Meloy?

(pedantic)
posted by pinky.p 19 January | 16:58
Winehouse is a wonderful singer. The first time I heard her, it stopped me in my tracks. Britney is not even a remotely good singer, and although I don't have an opinion on her as a performer, I'm sure she's got something going on. Had, I should say.

Trainwreckes, the both of them.
posted by Specklet 19 January | 17:10
pinky: yes, mea culpa. Colin Meloy = muppet, thanks.

Conor Oberst is merely shrill.
posted by lonefrontranger 19 January | 17:27
Much to my own surprise, I really like Amy Winehouse's music. I'm with Specklet, her voice stopped me dead the first time I heard it. Both the production and many of the lyrics on her records are clever and sassy. I think that the craziness is the only thing similar between her and Brit.

And personally, lonefrontranger, I can't see a comparison to Tori Amos at all.
posted by 2or3whiskeysodas 19 January | 17:42
What Specklet said. Girl can sing, even if we can't always understand the words.
posted by goo 20 January | 06:20
I'm a converted Winehouse fan. I just have lingering wonders about if someone manufactured her, or if it's her own vision. If that's really her schtick, she's brilliant, albeit fucked up.
posted by rainbaby 20 January | 08:38
Oh yeah, Winehouse has talent. And soul. A deeply fucked up, angry, bitter, damaged, loving, hurt, brassy, bareknuckled tattooed soul, to be sure. But, yes.

And Brittney? She's got nothing.
posted by rumple 20 January | 15:04
Suck it face! || Portland -

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN