MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and
chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.
There seems to be something of a competition amongst hardcore Radiohead fans I've encountered to prove who loves the band the most, and this seems to be a great way to, er, "reach" them.
Well, I'm still into owning a physical CD and £40 for the deluxe box is a bit steep for me at the moment and a normal release is coming in January 2008. So I threw £2 at them for the download because, at the minimum, I'll be buying the normal one in January.
We were talking about this at the Local tonight. I don't really much care for Radiohead, so I'd pay $2 for the whole download. A band I did care for? For a 14-track DRM-free album, I'd pay between $5 and $15 (US), where $5 represents a band whose record I'd try to pick up used and $15 represents a band whose record I would pick up new (and buy advance tickets to the show for).
The only "extra" that would entice me to kick in more would be back catalog "rarities".
I think it's an interesting approach but not wholly unheard of. There's a service out there for any idiot with a four-track that actually lets the popularity of a tune determine its download price. If no-one is downloading the track, it's free, but as it becomes more popular, the price goes up (capping around $2, I think).
I don't think pay-what-its-worth will be the future of music sales, but I do think direct sales, instead of label sales, will be. Not that bands won't still need handlers and studio guys and whathaveyou, just that the services the guys other than the musicians provide will have to change. If that makes sense. It's 0430 and I'm up for no good goddamn reason.
I paid 6 pounds plus the handling fee thing. If it's good, I'll buy it on disc in some form later on. (I wasn't a huge fan of Hail to the Thief, so basically that's the bar- if it's better than that, I'll buy it on disc.)
I wasn't a huge fan of Hail to the Thief, so basically that's the bar- if it's better than that, I'll buy it on disc.
The feeling is that Thom got his ya-yas out on The Eraser and that In Rainbows is more of a 'group effort'. I wish he'd leave the really esoteric electronica on his future solo efforts. I *like* The Eraser, but I want to hear all five of the lads.
p.s.
Everyone has different valuations for recorded music, but for my own calculations for what a 'reasonable' price for downloaded music is:
- Using a budget of $160 for recorded music per year.
- One full 40 GB mp3 player @ $160 = (40GB) = $13/GB = 33 cents per album = 3 cents per track.
- &@ One half cent for the bandwidth for an entire album hosted at Amazon's S3.
- &@ As hosting costs then equal 20 cents/year: that leaves $159.80 for artist's royalties and compensation distribution costs. 32.5 cents/album, minus financing, to the artist.