MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

30 August 2007

I hate to admit it. Britney "Cheetos McPantsless" Spears' new single isn't nearly as horrible as I was expecting.
I'm not big on dance music, but I was expecting SOOOO much worse. It actually kind of grew on me by the end.
posted by miss lynnster 30 August | 23:01
"It's Britney, Bitch" is already my ringtone....;P
posted by iconomy 30 August | 23:09
Here's that and the other one, which is one of the worst songs I've ever heard, for real.
posted by iconomy 30 August | 23:11
I know, I kind of like it! Listened several times already.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 30 August | 23:14
Ooooooh. Yeah, that other one sucks rocks I have to say. Sounds like the Chipmunks on crack or something.
posted by miss lynnster 30 August | 23:20
I must say, Brit has got a pretty sophisticated grasp on webdesign; most of the sites on myspace aren't that well put together. Maybe her pantslessness came after a long night of coding. What can you say? She's an Artist.

Ugh. May I please retract my "hit" on the myspace page? I don't want to be 1/billionth of somebody's carefully crafted web analytics report which demonstrates Britney really is making a comeback, pay no attention to the smoking debris and this crater here.
posted by Triode 31 August | 01:02
No, that was rubbish. It's not helped by the endless gossip-rag/newspaper photos of her looking like some trailer-park crack whore and then hearing this where she's trying to be all sexy. Don't get me wrong, when Britney's on form she can perform songs really, really well. This, though, is terrible.
posted by TheDonF 31 August | 01:50
i would not remember to say it was less than memorable is if i didn't see this right now.

And damn you for that!
posted by ethylene 31 August | 02:07
Art that is created sheerly for profit isn't art I would ever listen to on purpose. Sorry. In a perfect world, I'll never hear this song at all.

*shrug*

She buys from the best Orlando schlockmeisters money can rent. It's probably by Max whatsisname, the same dude who wrote her other big tunes.

posted by chuckdarwin 31 August | 02:56
Never said it was GOOD. I said it was less horrible than I'd expected, though...
posted by miss lynnster 31 August | 02:58
Fair play, miss lynnster. I wasn't hatin on you... just the open sewer that I often refer to as "The Florida Music" (i.e. anything produced by the Disney Machine).
posted by chuckdarwin 31 August | 03:43
Doesn't have that "Toxic" hook that Max is so known for, so I don't think it's him. Holy crap it's like they stole the new wave eighties sound effects, added Toyah and Kim Wilde but not their sex appeal, then added the voices from Madonnas Sex CD - and churned in a blender with cheetos.
posted by dabitch 31 August | 05:44
The MySpace page wasn't designed by her or her people - it was thrown up in a second by a fan who wanted a place to store the songs. I'm sure she has a MySpace though...I mean, who doesn't ;)
posted by iconomy 31 August | 07:27
I bet beneath all the crazy, Britney's still got it. You go, girl! The video for this song could be totally hot.

She's apparently performing (this song, I suppose) at the MTV Video Music Awards. Can't wait to see that.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 31 August | 09:22
I hope she wears pants.
posted by miss lynnster 31 August | 09:46
What fun would that be? Hopefully she'll do like she did that year where she was wearing clothes and she ripped 'em off. Or better yet, she could come out all naked and crazy like, and then put ON clothes as the number went on. And by the end she'll be normal and clean and they'll hand her the babies and we'll all cheer the transformation.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 31 August | 09:56
Yo, that's touching, TPS. Seriously.
posted by Hugh Janus 31 August | 10:07
I couldn't finish either one.
posted by desjardins 31 August | 10:12
Well of course, without producers and engineers she couldn't make a decent answering machine message though. That's the problem nowadays with singers, technically they don't even really have to know how to sing if they hired the right team of people. Kinda sick.
posted by miss lynnster 31 August | 10:32
Yeah, it's all manufactured tripe.

The people who SHOULD be famous are the producers. The singers are generic and a dime a dozen.

Heck, they could make me-or Wendell- a pop star if they threw enough money at the project.
posted by bunnyfire 31 August | 10:54
Saddest part is if Aretha Franklin or Ella Fitzgerald were just starting out now, they could never get a record deal. :(
posted by miss lynnster 31 August | 11:50
Oh, I don't think that's true. They might not be played on MTV or on the top 40 radio, but there's more to music than that.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 31 August | 12:36
Well, I think it's kinda true what miss lynnster says. I've always admired (shameless plug for someone who is a really nice person to boot) Stephanie Rice's voice, but you don't see record deals raining all over her. Probably because she keeps her pants on! Ha. I just wish I could hear that on MTV one day.
posted by dabitch 31 August | 12:44
...oh and GET OFF MY LAWN, .. I kinda felt old saying that.
posted by dabitch 31 August | 12:44
Plenty of people don't get record deals- why, I know a thousand girls my age (young, thin, sexy girls!) who can't get record deals. It's not a right guaranteed by the Constitution; that's why I find any whining along the lines of "Oh, I can't get a record deal because I'm X and not Y" really lame.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 31 August | 13:35
It ain't about rights or the constitution, TPS, and I think you know that. But since all pop musicians appear on TV nowadays, record company execs care more about headshots than demo tapes, like they were casting directors or something. Shit, even classical musicians have to be purty and skinny now (maybe not all, but the skinny ones sell all the records though they might be far from top-notch. I call it the Anna Kournikova effect, and it's real). Seriously, finding it lame or not wont change the fact that it's a fact.
posted by Hugh Janus 31 August | 13:49
Well, I suppose for me it's not about wanting a record deal, rather it's about something else. I know when I've been in the studio & nailed something in one take, the engineers are always making comments like, "Oh hey, people can still do that? Wow, you just made my life easier!" But in the past, it was REQUIRED to hit notes and be able to sing things without assistance if you were a singer. It was your JOB. Now it's not. You miss a note and they snap it digitally to the nearest one. The skill isn't required.

I see that as a problem. And as really sad. Why ever work to be good at anything anymore? It's like it doesn't even matter.
posted by miss lynnster 31 August | 18:49
Why MetaChat Should Have a Cool Tagline: || WTG Iowa district court

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN