MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

07 May 2007

Why Not the Worst? Joe Queenan writes, in the NYT Book Review, about the pleasures of bad books.
post by: box at: 10:15 | 4 comments
I don't see why bad books shouldn't exist, but even when I'm enjoying something awful, I can't take more that three hours of it at the most before it ceases to be amusing. With a bad book you're in for 10-15 hours or more of badness, maybe.
posted by Prospero 07 May | 14:24
Well that's one way to get people to read Balsamic Dreams.
posted by Lentrohamsanin 07 May | 16:04
To say nothing of that piece of crap love letter to Anglophilia.
posted by box 07 May | 16:06
He mentioned the volume "Loins of Telemachus"; I couldn't find it on Amazon, tho. Too bad — I've often wondered how the ancient Greeks did their barbecuin'....
posted by rob511 07 May | 19:40
More baby owl news. || Albino Baby Pygmy Hedgehog!

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN