MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

24 February 2007

This interested me: last.fm and the Stones I discovered that you can see charts based on the listening habits of last.fm users and the countries they live in.[More:]

In UK, Canada and USA, the Stones aren't in the top 50, whereas the Beatles are. And yet the Stones are one of the biggest concert draws on the planet. Initially I thought it was just because they're an older group whose fans might not be down with the internet thing, but I think the popularity of the Beatles in those charts disproves that. At least I think it does. The Stones do appear in France's and Spain's charts, but not in those for Italy, Denmark or Germany either (all which are depressingly full of non-native music). I'm bored of checking countries now, but can anyone think why the Stones are so massively popular in real life but seemingly less so online?
Because nerds listen to the Beatles and use Web 2.0 sites. Stones fans are too cool for that shit.

Notwithstanding my own evidence (Stones #7, Beatles #17 on my all time chart).
posted by mullacc 24 February | 04:58
Because the Stones blew any web cred they might have had when they let "Start Me Up" be used to shill Windows 95?
posted by felix betachat 24 February | 06:50
Everyone have a Beatles mp3. Even Paris Hilton. I have just Eleanor Rigby at the moment in my playlist. Used to have all Revolver and the White Album and some other mixed songs but then I reduced my itunes database from 20GB to circa 5 to fit everything in my iPod Nano.
posted by darkripper 24 February | 06:51
Because the Beatles are slightly trendy (but still pants). The Stones aren't cool at all. I don't recognise the Stones or any of their music (early twentysomething).
posted by flopsy 24 February | 08:27
Here's a theory I'm too lazy to confirm:

Listeners have a bias towards newly released records. The Stones new material is mostly shit and no one is interested in that. The Beatles "new" material are remixes or alternate versions of old favorites.

Or to put it another way, most folk have a bias towards records they've just bought, and stuff that's familiar.

...looks at Tracks chart for UK...

All The Beatles tracks in there are on the Love album so I guess that kind of confirms it.
posted by dodgygeezer 24 February | 10:07
I hadn't thought of that dodgygeezer - the Love album probably has a lot to do with it. And when the Apple Inc/Apple Corps/iTunes announcement happens, as it will, then Beatles stuff will do through the roof.
posted by TheDonF 24 February | 10:26
Does anyone know anything about the Honi phenomenom? || Bunny!

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN