MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

11 November 2006

WTFOMGBBQSPARERIBS!
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 11 November | 11:27
Well, to be reasonable, it's just an extension of, "spelling and grammar don't strictly matter as long as the content is meaninful and understandable." This has been the literal policy on US standardized exams for a while, although I've been told by exam graders that they DO take spelling and grammar into account.
posted by muddgirl 11 November | 11:38
"spelling and grammar don't strictly matter as long as the content is meaninful and understandable."

Ugh. I hate that. It does such a disservice to the students. When they get jobs in the real world, sending a memo to the CEO that says "CU @ teh mtg" will get your ass canned.
posted by jrossi4r 11 November | 11:53
Haque stressed that in some exams, including English, text abbreviations would be penalized.


Would be, or would not be? It says would be. As it stands, this seems to me to be a beat up. Markers are allowed to admit that "u r wrong" is English, but penalize it for being crap English.

What's the story?
posted by GeckoDundee 11 November | 12:28
My theory is in a few generations we're actually going to be speaking in textspeak or at New York Post headline-speak, so why not be in the vanguard, huh?
posted by jonmc 11 November | 12:35
Yeah, i assume they mean that it will be allowed in, I dunno, chemistry exams for example, but not English exams.

Which does does a disservice to the English exam, in my opinion.
posted by gaspode 11 November | 13:00
My theory is in a few generations we're actually going to be speaking in textspeak

dblplsgood kthxbye.

Yeah, i assume they mean that it will be allowed in, I dunno, chemistry exams

ChemSpeak, anyone? Cu LaTeRe HoAmIEs.

posted by hangashore 11 November | 13:26
Break out the guns, this cannot be allowed to continue. In a couple of generations, kids will be born with lightening-fast thumbs that have smaller, pointier tips, ideal for moving efficiently over a mobile phone keypad. You wait and see.
posted by TheDonF 11 November | 13:36
When they get jobs in the real world, sending a memo to the CEO that says "CU @ teh mtg" will get your ass canned.


I dunno, that would be considered relatively eloquent in most of the places I've worked. At least it makes sense grammatically.
posted by chrismear 11 November | 13:40
dblplsgood kthxbye.

I don't speak txt... I only know one sentence:

hirez pix plz kthxbai :)
posted by Daniel Charms 11 November | 13:42
Why should I even have to write anything?

Or articulate whole words out loud?

What if I just grunted and gestured in a way that "clearly show[ed] the required understanding"? Could I still get credit for that?
posted by jason's_planet 11 November | 14:01
*ughs affirmatively*
posted by jonmc 11 November | 14:08
How do I ask for a beer in txt?
posted by Daniel Charms 11 November | 14:24
What depressing news.
posted by amro 11 November | 15:39
And here I was thinking that Godzone was one of the last bastions of common sense in the world. As has alrady been mentioned, this whole dumbing down of language requirements academically continues to ignore a simple, basic fact - if you can't string words together with at least rudimentary English in them, YOU CAN'T GET A DECENT FUCKING JOB!!! In almost all jobs, you need basic literacy skills to move beyond entry-level and employers are starting to realise that the money they save by hiring younger workers is sucked up by having to teach them how to write in English. Meanwhile, in the real world, I still get reports sent back to me for misplaced commas.
posted by dg 12 November | 17:13
By my count, ||

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN