MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

10 August 2006

How is "interestingness" determined on Flickr? It seems totally random.

Also: how can I tell if one of my pics gets on the Explore dealie?
You know, now that I'm the queen of Flickr and all...
posted by Specklet 10 August | 19:26
You guys know that I'm so joking, right?
posted by Specklet 10 August | 19:27
Flickr inspector?
posted by interrobang 10 August | 19:29
Interestingness!
Besides being a five syllable word suitable for tongue twisters, it is also an amazing new Flickr Feature.

There are lots of things that make a photo 'interesting' (or not) in the Flickr. Where the clickthroughs are coming from; who comments on it and when; who marks it as a favorite; its tags and many more things which are constantly changing. Interestingness changes over time, as more and more fantastic photos and stories are added to Flickr.

posted by Wedge 10 August | 19:31
Boobies.
posted by danostuporstar 10 August | 19:41
Double fucking post!

:-)
posted by mudpuppie 10 August | 19:42
Pupps just linked to the last thread where I posted this, but just to recap: you can find your pics on Flickr's "Explore" here:

http://flagrantdisregard.com/flickr/scout.php

Wedge did a good job of describing the criteria for getting into "Explore" above. Since I like to take pics of ugly houses and laundromats and such, I'm not usually even in the running. :)
posted by BoringPostcards 10 August | 20:18
A photo I was in (well, I wasn't "in" it; I was it- just me) was once as high as #459 on the interesting charts. I have no idea what that means, but it makes me feel good.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 10 August | 20:31
It may just be me, but I rarely see anything neat in Explore.
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 10 August | 21:25
Double fucking post!

:-)


This post contains much less double-fucking than I anticipated. :(
posted by pieisexactlythree 11 August | 01:03
Thanks, guys. I still think the way interestingness is calculated is kind of bogus, but the pic my friend Tom took is #240, and he'll be pleased.
posted by Specklet 11 August | 10:22
dammit cmonkey!! where's your bloody || IRC

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN