MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and
chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.
27 June 2006
I've wasted too much of my life...→[More:]listening to people tell me things I don't believe. Sports suck, this beer sucks, Lynyrd Skynyrd sucks, people suck...blahblah I don't listen to my heart enough. Now I'm 36, and still feel quite lost, and my joy de vivre is waning, although I'm not licked yet.
Why do people have to constantly inflict their opinions on you? Why do we listen? So many questions...
Well, clearly it's because you are mistaken and by explaining that to you, perhaps people can help you see the light and thus live a more fulfilling life. Or because it makes them feel better for other, more atavistic reasons.
I hear ya, brother. I can listen to someone else's opinions until I'm blue in the face, but it's the point where it turns to me, where they say, "Why don't YOU x, y and z, because I say so" that really makes me crazy.
Not old at all. Although I take great pleasure in the fact that you're older than I am.
I'm so used to people telling me that the things I like suck that I actually kind of enjoy it. The first time my book club actually liked the book I picked, it made me think the book must be crap. And if my 17yo sister doesn't mock the music I'm listening to, well that's a bad, bad thing.
On preview: Now I'm singing "Shit Dog" in my head to the tune of Social Distortion's "Sick Boy." That band annoys my husband and therefore clearly ROCKS.
At some point it's good to sit back and wonder if "your" opinions are really your own. It's a bit like changing your mind on a subject -- a sign that if nothing else, you still do have a mind that's amenable to change and reason.
I think lots of times I don't even really have an opinion, just thoughts and confusion and you know, it is what it is...but I always feel this unspoken thing that you have to have an opinion... whatdoyouthinkwhatdoyouthink...well, garlic salt.
Garlic Salt.
Also, I like Specklet. shux.
You just go ahead and say my name anyway you say it. Just say mah name.
I'm always amused by use of the word "inflicting" in this kind of context. It's like people who hate cell phones because-- horrors!-- people might actually call. The solution to both is simple: don't respond unless you want to. I'd rather be flooded with opinions than be ignorant of them.
I like eamondaly. Also, I like opinions (shockingly!). Finally, I don't think 36 is old, but it is older than I thought you were. I thought you were my age, which is abput ten years younger than that. Then again, I thought jrossi was older than that (wisdom, child &c.), so I clearly know nothing.
I once snorted Mrs. Dash (salt substitute) it was like someone pounded a roofing nail through my cheek bone and into my sinuses. Never do that, that is what my 30 years on this earth have taught me. DO NOT SNORT MRS. FUCKING CRAZY BITCH TRIED TO KILL ME DASH.
"It is what it is" is a great opinion. That's exactly the opinion I have about most things. If I like or dislike something, I just think that this is how it strikes me, and other people are prefectly free to have an opposite response to it. It is what it is.
Maybe (many) people spend a lot of time defending or promoting their personal preferences because they are insecure that someone else who feels differently may consider them "wrong".
Yeah, "inflicting" is a giveaway word there, eamondaly. I do realize it's up to me. I think I'm just having a moment of weakness. I could have let it pass, but I was enjoying ya'lls company today. I've certainly had my share of "fuckems" in my life, but I admit sometimes I let opinionated people get the better of me.
And I don't really have an opinion on opinions. But drinking bongwater will give you a headache.
Yo, snorting crushed Advil may give you a nosebleed that lasts for an hour or so. Freebasing it makes you see red for a little bit and then you get diarrhea.
I don't mind opinions - you're either an idiot or believe the same things I do. I keed, I keed!
Semi-derail: what was hard for me was being told to live my life the way someone else dictated (hi mum!). I didn't do it, for the most part, but the guilt was difficult to deal with. I was finally able to break free of it and our relationship is so much better for it.
I couldn't disagree more with "it is what it is". It's important to examine why you like the things you like and why you hate the things you hate: those emotions are excellent touchstones for learning more about yourself as a person and your place in the communities around you. To float through life without ever thinking about such things is a lost opportunity at best and misanthropy at worst.
I spend a lot of time defending and promoting my personal preferences because a) I like widgets and so I like talking about widgets and b) I suspect many of my friends and family might also like widgets, so I enjoy sharing the magic of widgets with them and c) I'm always hoping someone who doesn't like widgets can explain to me what they think is wrong with widgets, thereby giving me an opportunity to reevaluate my love of widgets. That's normal, healthy interaction, and it's how people learn and grow.
Finally, "wrong" is just a temporary state of being. It worries me about as much as, say, rain. Or dropped ice creams. Fix it, endure it, or accept it.
Sometimes you get opinions the hard way. Snorting napkins ain't as bad as it sounds.
As for drugs, I'll stick to snorthing the purple pill. It's like seeing what Prince sees, but only for 10-15 minutes at a time. I just wrote a song called "Hollandaise Seahorse".
It's important to examine why you like the things you like and why you hate the things you hate
I disagree. I don't need to spend a lot of time contemplating why I like cold beer, songs with a funky horn section and people who hug me for no good reason. I DO need to spend more time hugging my friends while drinking a lager and listening to Jungle Boogie. It is a wiser use of my time.
Lester Bangs said, "Never be ashamed to admit what you like."
I thought that was good advice.
To me, life is about what is possible. Each of us is a unique invidual, our perception of the world and each other is different. And it's beautiful that way.
Although I don't know you personally...what I have seen of your writings here shows that you have a pretty open mind and a curiousity about things. What else d'ya need really?
My freak flag will fly soon, and ya'll 'll be the sorrier for it...Gotta get it up the damn pole first! I spend more time making the flag than letting it fly! sup black8!
also, i feel much better now. this shit works. huh. thanks again.
jrossi: well, do you like beer because it's tasty, or because it's accessible, or because it gets you drunk, or because it's the only way you can get through the day? The answer to that is clearly quite important to your liver and your ability to spend tomorrow hugging and boogie-ing.
I'm not suggesting people throw on a hairshirt every time they eat a candy bar, but it's important to ask these questions of yourself every once in a while.
I love what jrossi just said. But then again, I started reading this half an hour ago, so she might have said something else since then. You'll just have to wonder what I mean.
Hobo lady: Can any of y'all help me? I need some food!
Rider lady: Would you like this?
Hobo lady: What the hell is that?
Rider lady: It's a kiwi.
Hobo lady: Bitch! I said I need some food!
I don't mind people's opinions—or their telling me about them—at all. I do mind hearing an excess of their contempt, though. ("Excess" being more than a very small amount.) Almost nothing anyone says to me feels like an "infliction"...but contempt does. And it's interesting how contempt is the difference between healthy dislike and the narcissistic attack on other people that characterizes this sort of opinion. It's also a sort of whining.
i think you nailed it for me, kmellis. Yes. Contempt. That's exactly what I meant in my original statement. Perfect. Thank you. Thank you.
How are you, if I may ask?
And it's interesting how contempt is the difference between healthy dislike and the narcissistic attack on other people that characterizes this sort of opinion.
For you. For me it's just a sign someone really cares.
Here's how I look at it. There are tastes, and there are opinions.
Anyone beyond the age of, oh, 20, who has the nerve to tell you that your tastes suck is profoundly immature. Tastes vary. "There's no accounting for taste" is one of my favorites sayings. What moves a person about a band, song, movie, author, destination, magazine, clothing style is as idiosyncratic as a fingerprint (or should be, if people are thinking at all independently). The assertion that somehow, my taste might be empirically better than yours is not supportable. There are some widely shared tastes, and some obscure tastes.
There are some artistic criteria that can be developed within groups, and applied thoughtfully, to create a hierarchy of achievement (e.g, Shakespeare was a better playwright than Neil Simon because he met a given set of critera better), but that is not the same thing as taste. One can recognize some validity in that statement, and still prefer to see a Neil Simon play on Friday night.
I'm glad to have reached the stage in life where people recognize that it's silly to demean someone else's tastes -- especially when the someone else has earnestly cultivated their own taste, often against cultural pressure. How often have I maligned someone's favorite band, only to have them explain their sincere reasons for liking whatever band and bring my point of view around? That has caused me to accept others' tastes with a much more open mind. I've learned to say "I don't care for action movies," or "That band has never interested me very much," rather than "That movie sucks," or "Only posers like that band."
Opinions, on the other hand, I think of as different from tastes. I think of opinions being important where matters of politics and policy are concerned. In my view, there is so much at stake when talking about our governance, social justice, and civil society that I do argue vehemently for my point of view in those arenas. I consider them less a matter of taste, since policy decisions affect everyone, not just the people who prefer them.
tha 3 to tha 6! Thanks for your thoughts, Meex.
This thread made my day. And during it came the good news from my doctor that the mass I had removed last week from my right nut (who knew there was a religious ceremony going on in there) is benign. B-9! B-9! Bingo!
And wooo! *bites fist* thanks Speck, I'm totally flattered, and way spoken for. I'm in NY.
I still think there's a difference between tastes that are cultivated and tastes that appear to represent a complete lack of taste. I'm specifically referring to mass culture items that people consume not because they have a particular desire for them but because they're there. If someone expresses a taste preference for the films of Takashi Miike, I can understand that they have their reasons and that I do not share them, and I can still respect that person even while I am saying "That's not to my taste." On the other hand, if they like The Garfield Movie or other items of that ilk, it does cross my mind to wonder what on earth human motivation could spur them to like that kind of thing. But then, I know I'm an elitist intellectual snob.
If this thread gets any sweeter, I'm going to off myself with a chocolate revolver. It won't even be messy - my blood has already turned into rich chocolate syrup - just send in the dogs.
Oh wait, that would kill the dogs then, huh?
Must a been a great party. There's all this colorful shit on the floor, the cd player is skipping thru a 30 second break of "I got you Babe", what appears to be gobs of chocolate buttercream on the kitchen wall, a red sneaker with a half bottle of rolling rock set in it, it's snowed popcorn and these lines of orange powder next to a cut off straw....
Not any better. I'll probably see a doctor tomorrow or Friday. Thanks for asking.
Contrary to Miko, I do think some people have better taste than others. I also think that it can be learned, but also native. And I do think that in all things, including art, by some definition things are better and worse than other things.
Even so, I don't take other people's bad taste or bad opinions as a personal affront. There's something insidiously insecure about that—the only reason to be so personally insulted that other people don't agree with you is that you have a childish need for other people to agree with you.
Furthermore, there is something very shallow about investing so much in so little. The implication is that people with bad taste or bad opinions are somehow less worthy as people. But the variety of human experience and the complexity of human character is so vast that it seems absurd to me to qualify someone's entire character on the basis of their favorite band, film, or even their politics.
I raise an eyebrow at the equation of caring and contempt.
in all things, including art, by some definition things are better and worse than other things.
Only if a set of mutually accepted criteria is taken as the starting point, which is exactly what I was saying (your 'by some definition'). Otherwise there's no basis for making an argument that something is better than something else; the only other resort is to rely on taste. And simple taste is completely idiosyncratic and is built by biographical and personality factors that have nothing to do with the inherent qualities of the thing itself ("I love the Garfield movie because my grandfather and I used to read Garfield over the kitchen table when I stayed at their house as a kid...").
This is why I love the Kingston Trio even though I can make and agree with a strong argument that they're absolutely terrible corny colonialist hacks who made a complete joke of traditional music and did more harm to the public impression of folk culture than perhaps anyone. But my Dad was into them and we made a project of collecting their entire discography, and we still sing their songs, and so I actually enjoy them. I agree with kmellis that judging on taste is really shallow.
But I stand by my guns where politics is concerned. There is little or no moral dimension to taste in arts, food, or entertainment. But there is a moral dimension to political views and actions, and because we are all governed by the outcomes of political decisions, opinions in this area have much greater power to impact the lives of others than opinions about the best type of sushi.
Well, I think there's a moral dimension to most everthing, particularly art. But certainly I will agree that this is most true in the case of politics.
Even so, what it means to be a good person or a bad person is something so expansive (or, contrarily, easily something so specific) that generalizations on the basis of political beliefs is unfair and simplistic.