MetaChat is an informal place for MeFites to touch base and post, discuss and
chatter about topics that may not belong on MetaFilter. Questions? Check the FAQ. Please note: This is important.
16 May 2006
Here Comes the Hangman! Continued from yesterday. Don't let the Cabana Boy hog all the guesses!→[More:]
|----|
| O
| |
|
|
|
------
So, if I understand correctly, you filled in the rest of 'sequoias' after mudpuppie guessed it (but not 'huge,' because that's wrong?)? If there were O's, U's, or Q's in the first two words, would you have filled those in as well?
I always hated the Encyclopedia Brown books as a youth. Here's this nerdy kid whose explanations would never stand up in court, and, when he confronts the evildoers (nine times out of ten one of the town bullies) with some cock-and-bull story composed of conjecture and generalization and circumstantial evidence, they'd always confess. Even by the standards of mystery stories, this seems unrealistic.
Indeed. And it's not like Encyclopedia Brown was the first detective of this kind--among others, Perry Mason usually followed a similar format. And the E.B. books got me into reading mysteries and crime fiction, which I greatly enjoy. Also, anything that gets the kids reading is a-okay with me.
I remember once when my dad brought home a whole bunch of "remaindered" books from the Kmart he was working at. One of the things I read from non-cover to cover was an Alfred Hitchcock book that was written very much like the Encyclopedia Brown kinds of books. From that one, I learned about puzzles and how a house can sometimes have its roof taken off.