MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

11 February 2006

We're getting our own Eurovision --but it'll be State vs. State.
"Eurovision is the granddaddy of all talent shows and the Super Bowl of singing"

I don't know where to start in explaining how mistaken that is.
posted by essexjan 11 February | 14:34
Don't be knocking the Eurovision. The only thing wrong with that statement is that it doesn't capture the IMMENSE MAGNITUDE AND AWESOME NINJA POWER of the competition.

Here's hoping the States do it properly. Remember, people don't want life stories and *heart*, they want a bunch of songs they can vote on. They want to feel robbed when they don't win. They want to vote according to centuries old enmities. They want to be able to laugh at the Polish presenter as she gives her vote. They want to give each other that eyebrow raising thing when Greece gives Cyprus 12 points.
posted by seanyboy 11 February | 16:01
How does Eurovision account for differences in the voting population of the member countries? Or is it just judges?
posted by ooga_booga 11 February | 16:26
Each country gets the same voting privileges. So, France get to give 11 of the other countries 12, 10, 9, 8 .. 1 votes. How a country allocates points depends on the country. It used to be that most countries had a judging panel that allocated the votes, but now its more likely to allocate based on popularity in the home country based on phone votes.
posted by seanyboy 11 February | 16:55
The other great thing about Eurovision is that it happens over one night only. It's perfect for a yearly party of friends, beer, dips etc. I'll hear the swedish entry once before the voting. Only Once. If they try and turn it into a series, then they're going to take some of the fun out of it.
posted by seanyboy 11 February | 16:58
I thought American Idol was our Eurovision. Oh, this means more of the same? Then just shoot me now.
posted by jonmc 11 February | 17:07
And the voting is always highly partisan. Greece and Turkey never give each other any votes. The UK tries to avoid giving any votes for Germany.

It's actually a songwriter's competition, the winner is the songwriter, although that's usually lost somewhere along the way.

The winning song is hardly ever memorable (except for being truly awful Euro-pap). The best songs to win it were 'Waterloo' by Abba and 'What's Another Year', a finely-crafted song performed by Ireland's Johnny Logan.
posted by essexjan 11 February | 17:36
This might be a good time for talented people to move from Califonia to Wymoning, where the preliminary competition won't be nearly as heavy. (They got like 14 people living in that state?)
posted by wendell 11 February | 18:12
Famous entrants in eurovision: Abba (duh!), Celine Dion for Switzerland and I seem to recall that Olivia Newton-John sneaked in too.

The reason a Canadian can enter is because (as seany mentioned) it's about the song not the singer. In fact Britain's last victory was performed by Katrina & the Waves (isn't she a Canadian?).

I hate to say this but I doubt a cross-state competition will be as interesting as the Eurovision. There's too much common ground and too little cultural disparity to make it interesting. Still, I think it's worth a go.
posted by dodgygeezer 11 February | 20:51
I am totally going to watch this.
posted by sisterhavana 11 February | 23:09
OMG Bunny!! || Random Radio Laundry

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN