MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

06 January 2006

Plus sized? I don't buy it. Is the woman in the pictured really "plus sized"?
According to those who market women's clothes, everyone over 100 pounds is "plus-sized," I think.
posted by BoringPostcards 06 January | 22:33
Yeah, "not waif" = "plus sized".
posted by bmarkey 06 January | 22:36
In terms of sizes, I think anything over a 12 (or 14? 16?) is "plus-sized".
posted by ThePinkSuperhero 06 January | 22:37
Maybe she's tall.
posted by Eideteker 06 January | 22:37
Anything over size 16, you can't get in a normal store, you have to go to "women's".
posted by matildaben 06 January | 22:39
Please, let me just pre-emptively say, I know this isn't MetaFilter, but please let's not get into a pissing match about anything here.
posted by matildaben 06 January | 22:40
OHMYGOD SHE IS SO FAT. The link did not work for me, so I have no idea if the image is even of a person.
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 06 January | 22:46
i have been werekilled. freaking wererabbits crack me up.
posted by ethylene 06 January | 22:48
She's probably not large enough to actually fit into the clothes they sell at Layne Bryant, so calling her plus-sized is misleading in that context. She looks like a 12 -14 to me.

I love the way she's posing...hee. Like anyone stands like that. How come men never have to do doofy poses like that? But then again, guys magazines always do those stupid "hand stroking the chin while I gaze pensively at something off-camera" shots and I always laugh at them too.

For were:

≡ Click to see image ≡
posted by iconomy 06 January | 22:49
where's the plus? she looks all up and down like a column?
posted by ethylene 06 January | 22:50
is it the extra white smile?
i think it's photoshop
posted by ethylene 06 January | 22:51
this is a fashion issue
posted by ethylene 06 January | 22:52
and i mean that get up suxors
posted by ethylene 06 January | 22:53
What's with the snake crawling under her breasts?
posted by bmarkey 06 January | 22:57
That's her underwire boa.
posted by iconomy 06 January | 23:00
I have no opinion, other than she's hot.
posted by mudpuppie 06 January | 23:00
I must have that domain in my hosts file or something.
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 06 January | 23:01
Where did you find this ad? My, umm, wife gets lots of Lane Bryant mail but Ishe hasn't seen this model before.
posted by danostuporstar 06 January | 23:01
That's her underwire boa.


I just snorted in public.
posted by bmarkey 06 January | 23:04
Not in my hosts file. Who knows. I still can't connect or see the image in thread either. *shrugs*
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 06 January | 23:09
It is a MYSTERY.

*kills self*
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 06 January | 23:10
Lane Bryant the store is totally different than Lane Bryant the catalog. I have no idea why two different companies have the same name.
posted by matildaben 06 January | 23:10
I think Lane Bryant sells size 14 and up.

She looked about a 14 to me, that is if she's tall.
posted by bunnyfire 06 January | 23:12
it's anything over 12--i'm almost sure. she looks like a 14-16 to me.

(my creative director had me doing a model search for a shoot in FL later in the month. i had 2 requirements, and one was that she be a size 4)
posted by amberglow 06 January | 23:23
Plus sized means anyone without an obvious eating disorder.
posted by LarryC 06 January | 23:35
Music to view the photo by.
posted by iconomy 06 January | 23:48
She looks about my size and I'm a 14 or a 12 on a good day. I certainly don't consider myself plus sized, even though I know fashion people do!
posted by gaspode 06 January | 23:48
Yeah, she's about my size, and I'm a 12/14. soon I will be a 10 again if it kills me. I've shopped at Lane Bryant because they actually have tall clothes; I have long legs and it's hard to find anything proportioned right. Mostly their clothes are pretty hideous though.
posted by mygothlaundry 07 January | 00:34
That's her underwire boa.


*swoons as comments crush on iconomy deepens yet more*
posted by melissa may 07 January | 00:37
About 10% of their clothes are non-hideous. You just have to know where to look. I got a cute satin shirt there yesterday.
posted by matildaben 07 January | 00:44
Yeah, they do have some okay stuff, but they tend too much to that weird officey polyester gray-pantsuit-with-a-kneelength-sweater-thing for me. If the outfit looks like you might see it marching down the street accompanied by white sweatsox and Nikes, well, that's just the fashion kiss of death. ;-)
posted by mygothlaundry 07 January | 00:56
I vote "NO."

But then again, I am drunk and tried to login as "sasshatch."

Take that how you will.
posted by SassHat 07 January | 01:55
Have you ever watched America's Next Top Model. I certainly haven't (*ahem*), but I've been told about it.

It pisses me off to no end, the women on that show that they constantly call "big." Fuckin' jerks. (Oh, yeah, and "old." The one woman was 26 or something, and they talked about her like she was on old maid).

Not plus size.
posted by teece 07 January | 03:04
They do carry the elusive 36 DD bra. For all their vaunted "sexiness" Victoria's Secret rarely carries anything over a C cup.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy 07 January | 12:20
No, my feeble arms are bigger than hers - not plus size.

She's just got childbearing hips.

/size 10-12
//disclosing too much

posted by porpoise 07 January | 13:35
PLus size just means more than a size 12. And I think Lane Bryant's smallest size is what they call "12/14".

Interestingly, sizes aren't even an absolute standard. Every few years, clothing manufacturers adjust sizing. What is today considered a 12 would have been a 14 or even 16 in the 1950s. IN addition to overall size shifts, they also change the proportions in other places, like armholes and hip-to-waist ratio. It really plagues those of us who like vintage clothing.

Anyway, the gal looks great, but she wouldn't be able to work as a 'normal' model anyway, due to her belly, hips, breasts, and thighs. Compare her with a model from a fashion mag and you'll see the difference.
posted by Miko 07 January | 14:30
When did "plus sized" become "women's" anyway? Are we going to turn "woman" into a pejorative term for a fat person? I wouldn't be surprised with the number of people thinking a size 8 is the maximum size for being an attractive woman -- much smaller than that and you could wear kids' clothes (I have never in my life worn smaller than a size 8).
posted by euchrecthulhu 07 January | 15:04
I think that's a pretty old thing eurchrecthulhu; it seems like I remember that from ages ago... but at that time, I think it really was supposed to designate women's sizes as opposed to teen sizes. These days not being teensized is fat, I guess.

Thank goodness I've still not really worked out European sizes so I don't have to get too depressed.. I just eyeball things and take a couple of different sizes to try on... I have no idea if my size is embarrassing or not. Yay?
posted by taz 07 January | 15:13
I remember when I was a kid, there was a size designation for girls (approx. 6-12 year olds) that was called Chubbettes. I seriously am not kidding you. No freaking lie. I would be scarred for life if I had had to wear clothes from something called the Chubbettes section. Sometimes in life there is just no dignity, you know?

The Chubbettes would be a great band name tho.
posted by iconomy 07 January | 15:17
i'll be in "the Chubettes"
and i'll even loose weight for irony but i know thw motown schooling

this thread is waking up pendantic girl
*must gag pedantic pirl*
posted by ethylene 07 January | 19:28
Wow, Chubbettes was way worse than being a "Husky Boy". I'm amazed and dismayed at how the fashion industry manages to both make women hate themselves and want to spend money at the same time.

I'm betting that Lane Bryant ad is a Photoshop creation.
posted by tommasz 08 January | 00:20
L.A. MeChatters: In case you missed it on MeTa... || For Mecha's own 20th-century boy,

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN