MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

21 October 2005

Whoa! As I read that page q. also voted for deletion. Why the rancor?
posted by omiewise 21 October | 14:57
Jessamyn's disdainful dismissal of q and then her acceptance when he returned, is disingenuous.

She knows why quonsar is notable.

Their reasons for deletion suggest hypocrisy.
posted by mcgraw 21 October | 15:01
It's funny because she claims to believe in "free speech" and she deletes comments. Of course, I'd expect as much from someone who [venomous comment deleted]
posted by keswick 21 October | 15:02
So, I hear that librarians serve Shub Niggurath, the goat of the dark woods with a thousand young.
posted by selfnoise 21 October | 15:04
*hands out more cigars and machine guns*
posted by warbaby 21 October | 15:06
Hey, if the whole world learns about quonsar, everybody will want one.
posted by bunnyfire 21 October | 15:13
I agree. Putting unnecessary entries into an encyclopedia isn't free speech. And I'm not trying to start an argument about anybody else. I just don't think putting quonsar in wikipedia is anything but cultification, something the great man is apt to mock I would have thought.
[and mind you, I'd likely delete a lot of entries were I given any knife-wielding powers]
posted by peacay 21 October | 15:24
There is already too much shit in wikipedia, man. It is a good tool and there are a lot of things I am planning on adding this winter, but stuff like a shout-out to quonsar (come on, that is all it is) and similar articles just waste space. I do not think Jess should have an article there either.
posted by weretable and the undead chairs 21 October | 15:30
I just don't think putting quonsar in wikipedia is anything but cultification, something the great man is apt to mock I would have thought.

amen, brother
posted by matteo 21 October | 15:31
amen, brother

*rolls eyes*
posted by mcgraw 21 October | 15:34
So what I want to know is, did jessamyn write her own shout-out?

Is there such a thing as vanity cultification?
posted by Hugh Janus 21 October | 15:35
Having your own small cult is not in and of itself notable.

*sends cult packing, ponders alternate route to notability*
posted by jonmc 21 October | 15:35
Delete, per embarrassed quonsar. 03:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

'Nuff said really.
posted by fenriq 21 October | 15:37
"Having your own small cult is not in and of itself notable"

It isn't?
posted by mr_crash_davis 21 October | 15:37
*picks up jonmc's cult at the bus station, drives them to denny's for consolation dinner, explains "it's not you, it's him"*
posted by selfnoise 21 October | 15:37
"Having your own small cult is not in and of itself notable"

It isn't?

It isn't. This was notable because of the raid and seige.
posted by Specklet 21 October | 15:46
selfnoise: tell them I want those white robes returned, laundered, dammit.
posted by jonmc 21 October | 15:52
WTF? That quonsar's a non-notable blogger doesn't mean that she can't welcome him back to MeFi. Should we all have our own Wikipedia articles? How about Rothko and Dios? They were worth $500.
Don't you have better things to worry about?
posted by klangklangston 21 October | 15:55
100 quonsar 'cult' members.

I guess mathowie and jessamyn are in the 'cult' too huh?
posted by mcgraw 21 October | 15:55
Specklet, please adjust your wakkometer tia
posted by mr_crash_davis 21 October | 15:59
klangklangston, your wiki article will surely say what your MeCha user page says:

I'm currently trying to decrease my internet dick quotient. Bear with me, fucktards. Sorry.
posted by mcgraw 21 October | 15:59
mcgraw, my gif-lovin friend, let it go.
posted by danostuporstar 21 October | 16:04
If quonsar didn't want it then that is really all there is to it.

≡ Click to see image ≡

Just ask this guy.


We don't need beef, we need beef relief.
posted by Divine_Wino 21 October | 16:05
Hey mcgraw. I'm not sure this is worth pickin' a fight over. I don't say you shouldn't post this or support it even, but I would be surprised if the majority of people inhabiting here, MeFi or the world for that matter would just see it as a memecult. And I also agree with what kk said.
posted by peacay 21 October | 16:05
Look what brownpau found on the dcMetro.
≡ Click to see image ≡
posted by danostuporstar 21 October | 16:08
Specklet, please adjust your wakkometer tia


Whoopsie.
posted by Specklet 21 October | 16:12
It seemed more than hypocritical for Jess to recommend deletion and to pretend that she didn't know who q is, only to chime in with the CROWD when he returned to Mefi.

You can't have it both ways.

And Wiki Admin would have it both ways in allowing some articles while deleting others of similar significance.

But, I was wrong to make such a stink about it.

I shouldn't have posted this and wish I hadn't. Sorry to those who I offended.

See you around, everyone.
posted by mcgraw 21 October | 16:13
I don't think anyone is offended. Cya later.
posted by danostuporstar 21 October | 16:19
I was so offended that I asked someone to buy me a tall can of beer when they went to the gas station for snacks, then I realized I wasn't offended, I just wanted a beer. Which I have, which I am drinking.

G-D bless us everyone.

posted by Divine_Wino 21 October | 16:24
I don't see any hypocrisy.

I advocated for quonsar coming back (to a fair extent). And if I was wielding a blade at wikipedia I wouldn't announce I knew him.

And I'm proud PROUD I tellya, to be pro-Jessamyn. As long as the brown paper bags arrive weekly this arrangement shall continue.
posted by peacay 21 October | 16:28
Somebody buy q a drink.

Oh, wait....

*pours q a drink*
posted by warbaby 21 October | 16:38
I think it's going to have to be a soda pop, warbaby. IIRC q is on the wagon.
posted by mr_crash_davis 21 October | 16:55
Indeed he is.
So someone buy q a fancy-schmancy coffee drink with whipped cream on top. Since those are fabulous this time of year.
posted by kellydamnit 21 October | 18:04
If Jessamyn can have her own Wikipedia article, so can I!

... and one of these days I'm going to get around to writing it, too! ;-P
posted by mischief 21 October | 18:23
Peacay: You agree with me when? When I was all like, "Pshaw, whatevah," or when I was all like, "INTERNETS DICKERY!"
Because either one is cool.
posted by klangklangston 21 October | 19:39
mcgraw, you're scaring me.
posted by quonsar 21 October | 20:41
I dunno about Jessamyn, but I voted to delete because he didn't meet the Wikipedia standards for inclusion of living people. No pretending I didn't know him necessary.

Seriously, though, over there people are writing an encyclopedia, where there's regularly debates on whether or not tenured professors, or losing candidates for state and provincial elections, are sufficiently notable and verifiable for inclusion. This isn't some low blow at quonsar, it's just that an overwhelming majority of people aren't encyclopedic.
posted by mendel 21 October | 23:16
sorry, mcgraw, i was hoping to help you by sending a revision version/idea but life got in the way--
another time, we'll work on it
posted by ethylene 21 October | 23:22
I emailed quonsar to tell him there was an article-for-deletion vote about him [in case he didn't know] and also said in the AfD vote that I'd reconsider my vote on it if more was added to it. That email was what started the back and forth emails that eventually wound up with q being back at MeFi, which I supported and advocated for, so I think it wound up okay.
posted by jessamyn 22 October | 02:38
i think a lot of things wound up okay
posted by ethylene 22 October | 02:43
kk, yes.
posted by peacay 22 October | 05:47
Baby Bean! || For Omie

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN