MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

08 December 2007

Golden Compass. . .saw it. . .spoilers No cattle-gun executions, but[More:]a pretty good time. The CGI was what one would expect, at this date, with all of the characters' daemons following them around.

I had not heard the story, but it was pretty easy to follow. It bugged me that stylistically, they took a lot of the LOTR stuff (the look of it, a lot of the music, the narration) but it was a very very enjoyable movie and clearly sets up for the next one.

And Kidman is very good as a 3-dimensional villian. Some of the interplay between her and her daemon, and between her daemon and the daemons of others is brilliant.

I want to read the book now if I can find a copy that does not have a movie tie-in (ok that's a kind of snobbery in me).

I would like to live in a world that has flocks of flying witches.
Oh man, Danf, you'll love the book. All of the elements you said you liked in the movie play really well in the book also. Great ideas throughout, great characters.

Knock yourself out.
posted by Lipstick Thespian 08 December | 12:02
Anyone read "His Dark Materials"? I was thinking of picking that up. C&C on the series?
posted by Zack_Replica 08 December | 12:16
His Dark Materials is the name of the trilogy of books, the Golden Compass (aka Northern Lights in Britain) being the first installment.
posted by danf 08 December | 12:33
Ah, and that's me not doing enough research on the matter. :) I'd hoped it'd be a different story, because buying the book at the same time bugs me as it's like band-wagon jumping (to me) and I'm sure that lots of others are doing it, and I hate doing what others are doing. If it's good, I may just suck it up and buy 'em.
posted by Zack_Replica 08 December | 12:46
One big reason I wouldn't pick up the books is because there are no cattle-gun executions. In my oh-so-humble opinion, there really aren't enough of those. I'm sure adding a scene where Daniel Craig goes crazy-ape-bonkers with a cattle-gun and starts ganking daemons would really make people sit up and pay attention.
I think.
posted by Zack_Replica 08 December | 12:52
I saw Charlie Rose's interview of Sam Elliott last night, where Elliott was talking about this movie, among other topics. He was seemed proud of the project, but was nervously licking his moustache, and playing with it, which is a mannerism I detest, and as he was doing it more while talking about this movie, I took that as a sign of his nervousness about the film, on the heels of mixed reviews and lowered estimates for its opening.

I wanted to hand him a shaving mirror and a pair of scissors the whole time he was talking. He did mention all the principals being under contract for additional installments.
posted by paulsc 08 December | 12:53
I'm on the second book of the trilogy now (haven't picked it up in a month or so, however) and I definitely recommend reading them. Glad to know the movie was good, as I plan on seeing it tomorrow!
posted by CitrusFreak12 08 December | 13:25
Sam Eliot seemed to be playing the same character as he played in The Big Lebowski. Maybe it's the only "tone" he has. I don't know enough about him.

I half expected some of the chase scenes to end up in a bowling alley.
posted by danf 08 December | 14:54
I finished the book this morning and saw the movie this afternoon. The visuals were beautiful and the acting was good. But overall it seemed so rushed; it should have been an hour longer. However, they did do a good job in rearranging the presentation of important info. And I think casting Sam Elliot as Lee Scoresby was a bit of genius.

I would like to live in a world that has daemons.

I'll be starting The Subtle Knife in a day or two and I'm really looking forward to it.
posted by deborah 08 December | 20:57
Just saw it. I don't usually like this sort of movie, but this one is head and shoulders above the genre. It IS rushed, but oddly, I appreciated the way they paced it faster, leaving out a lot of slow exposition, rather than oversimplifying the plot. It was a compliment to the viewer's ability to put the pieces together without a lot of sacrifice of story.

Just beautiful to look at, and what a terrific depiction of a female lead.
posted by Miko 10 December | 22:26
I hear that they cut all the philosophy stuff out - ostensibly because anti-religious sentiment would be box office poison in the states. Both of the reviewers I saw were quite disappointed with the script and the truncated plot. Apparently, it was a troubled production.

Ross said "instead of showing some of the plot points from the book, characters just talked about it. Last time I checked, film was still a visual medium..."

I'm pretty sure that I'm not going to bother seeing it. I haven't read Pullman's books, and I think I'd rather start there since this film has obviously betrayed his core ideas (religion is bad when taken too far, etc).
posted by chuckdarwin 11 December | 04:59
[furthermore] A 44% at RT is hardly what I'd call a glowing endorsement.

Here's a few snippets from that esteemed database (and, frankly, what will keep me from giving £20 to see it):

A crushing disappointment for fans and a scuppered opportunity for a cinematic event. That the first book has been so mishandled doesn’t bode well for the (already greenlit) more complicated ones to come.

Almost nothing remains at the end – not a glimmer of mystical inquisition, not a teasing loose-end of space-time speculation – to lure a Pullmanite towards a sequel.

In the end The Golden Compass is another expensive mishmash of CGI 'magic' and widescreen spectacle: well-acted, as you would expect, but more or less empty of anything to provoke the curiosity and intelligence of a young audience.

Maybe we were all expecting too much. While competent, The Golden Compass joins that catalogue of so-so Narnia/Potter wannabes whose members include Lemony Snicket, Eragon and the recent Stardust.

It packs enough fun and fantasy to keep the kid in you entertained and engaged. And we can always hope that the sequel will try to tackle some of the fascinating and more complex ideas from the book.

The actors can hardly move among all the computer graphics, much less express any emotion or spontaneity; there's no sense of wonder.

A movie with characters constantly explaining arcane concepts and only rarely doing anything about them.

Covering too much ground in too little time leaves the film feeling shallow and inchoate.

An enormous scrap at the end, involving witches and warlocks, does little to illuminate, or leaven, this pudding.

...rushes headlong through many of the important nuances of its source material.
posted by chuckdarwin 11 December | 05:10
Wes Anderson's New Movie is a Dog! And I'm Pissed! || Miko's Musical MeCha Advent Calendar: December 8

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN