MetaChat REGISTER   ||   LOGIN   ||   IMAGES ARE OFF   ||   RECENT COMMENTS




artphoto by splunge
artphoto by TheophileEscargot
artphoto by Kronos_to_Earth
artphoto by ethylene

Home

About

Search

Archives

Mecha Wiki

Metachat Eye

Emcee

IRC Channels

IRC FAQ


 RSS


Comment Feed:

RSS

10 January 2007

"Difficult Decisions Involving a 3-Hour Pornographic Epic Starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid", by COBRA! .[More:]

1. Would you rather watch both Dr. Doolittle movies and both Nutty Professor movies, all back-to-back, or watch a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid?

2. If offered $80,000 to direct a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid (and you have to make a good-faith effort to make it as XXX as possible, no soft-pedaling), would you do it? You have to use your real name in the credits, and the title screen of the movie will read "Makin' Whoopi! A [your name]film."

3. Suppose a press gang forces you onto the production crew of a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid. You are given the limited choice, however, of being the cinematographer, meaning that you have to do all of the filming (but with relative anonymity), or being an Executive Producer who won't have to be on the set every day, but whose name will be used extensively in the marketing materials and who would have to do media appearances hyping the movie. Which do you choose?

4. In situation #3, how about if you were offered a third option, that of being an uncredited bit player who appears in every scene as the unlucky person who always happens to be in the room while Whoopi and/or Randy get it on?

5. If you could save one starving child in a developing country each time you watched a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, how many times would you watch it?

6. Suppose you are given the following terrible choice: either actor Jeff Goldblum is castrated or you must watch a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid every day for the rest of your life. Does Goldblum remain intact?

7. If you heard it through the grapevine that the person you had just started dating had once appeared in a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, would you watch it out of curiousity?

8. Suppose you are a struggling novelist. If you are offered a deal wherein your manuscript will be published and marketed by a major publishing house, with the understanding that it will be adapted into the screenplay for a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, would you take the deal?

9. Which would be more unpleasant: watching a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, or watching naughty home videos made by someone you knew?

10. If you came home and discovered your significant other watching a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, would it alter your relationship?

11. Would a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid be more or less disturbing if it were animated instead of live-action?

12. How about claymation?

13. Why the hell would anyone ever make a 3-hour pornographic epic starring Whoopi Goldberg and Randy Quaid, anyway?
≡ Click to see image ≡
posted by mudpuppie 10 January | 16:35
What the heck, mud...I did a google search and everything. I love how the pink bunny quietly hints at a double post here.

Damn you Specklet....damn you to hell!
posted by iconomy 10 January | 16:44
Oh, and you have a very good memory, mp. It was from Feb 2005. Do you have a trunk and a penchant for peanuts?
posted by iconomy 10 January | 16:46
Oh, and you have a very good memory, mp

...For Specklet's porn-related posts, yes.
posted by mudpuppie 10 January | 16:47
What what what what? I didn't post this, did I?

*giggles at pup's photoshop job*
posted by Specklet 10 January | 16:51
OMG, i LOL. Those are some seriously tough decisions I hope I never have to make.
I hesitate to say this, but, compared to the current Whoopi, the above Whoopi doesn't look half bad.

Oh, and Specklet has porn-related posts??
posted by Hellbient 10 January | 16:56
Hey QUIET!. . .there are some real philosophical quandaries here I am trying to parse out.
posted by danf 10 January | 17:32
LA LA LAAAA! *skips around thread* Wheeeeee-BEEP!
posted by Specklet 10 January | 17:49
For eighty thousand bucks I'd fuck Randy Quaid myself. Heck it'd probably be the most profitable thirty seconds of my life.
posted by dodgygeezer 10 January | 18:19
three hours? what, did he get a few tantric tips from sting or something?

i dunno... are we talking the apprenticeship of duddy kravitz randy quaid, the long riders randy quaid, kingpin randy quaid, or brokeback mountain randy quaid?

he was pretty hot in kingpin.
posted by syntax 10 January | 19:47
*has drunken penchant for penis*
posted by cortex 10 January | 20:16
Do you have a trunk and a penchant for peanuts?

Oh whatcha gonna do with all the trunk, all that trunk, all that trunk and some peanuts?
posted by loquacious 10 January | 20:49
You know, with the right script and John Waters producing, this could be fun.
posted by mischief 10 January | 21:54
Would Randy get to say (and simultaneously act out) the quote, "In the words of my generation, UP YOURS!"
posted by King of Prontopia 11 January | 00:48
Weird, I was just revisiting that today on COBRA!'s user page.

Er, yesterday.
posted by omiewise 11 January | 10:57
oh, and sorry about your penis, Mr. Goldblum.
posted by Hellbient 11 January | 12:51
Vintage Moscow || OMG! Tubgirl!

HOME  ||   REGISTER  ||   LOGIN