<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/0.9.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>MetaChat - Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
        <link>http://metachat.org/index.php?disp=comments</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=0.9.1"/>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587041@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>That was an interesting, sad, read. Thank you. It's not often you get to learn the follow up to a historic photograph.  </description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[That was an interesting, sad, read. Thank you. It's not often you get to learn the follow up to a historic photograph.  ]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587041</link>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587050@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>Wow, interesting.  I'm going to get the book from the library and read more.</description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, interesting.  I'm going to get the book from the library and read more.]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587050</link>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587054@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>Hazel seems easily swayed by others, even today, or neither the first nor last incidents could happen.</description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hazel seems easily swayed by others, even today, or neither the first nor last incidents could happen.]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587054</link>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587066@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>That was indeed interesting.  Fair or not, the original photo is an amazing symbol of the era.  </description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[That was indeed interesting.  Fair or not, the original photo is an amazing symbol of the era.  ]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587066</link>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587068@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>Hazel seems easily swayed by others, even today, or neither the first nor last incidents could happen.

And yet, I feel that what she did in the middle (did her own research and dug deep into the issues) is a more important thing to take away from this story.  Isn't that the point of Rachel from "Inherit the Wind" being the best character in that play?  That she actually sat down and read Origin of Species rather than trusting what both sides were telling her it was about?  Apply that to Hazel's situation, and I think she is a real winner for having the guts to be able to look at the opposing side with open eyes.</description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Hazel seems easily swayed by others, even today, or neither the first nor last incidents could happen.</i><br />
<br />
And yet, I feel that what she did in the middle (did her own research and dug deep into the issues) is a more important thing to take away from this story.  Isn't that the point of Rachel from "Inherit the Wind" being the best character in that play?  That she actually sat down and read <i>Origin of Species</i> rather than trusting what both sides were telling her it was about?  Apply that to Hazel's situation, and I think she is a real winner for having the guts to be able to look at the opposing side with open eyes.]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587068</link>
        </item>
                <item>
            <title>In response to: Elizabeth and Hazel</title>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">c587112@http://metachat.org</guid>
            <description>Who knows what privately passed between them or went on in her mind. We really don't get to have an idea what changed, since she won't talk. I just don't find much to respect there. Understand, yes, - human frailty - but respect, no.


</description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Who knows what privately passed between them or went on in her mind. We really don't get to have an idea what changed, since she won't talk. I just don't find much to respect there. Understand, yes, - human frailty - but respect, no.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
            <link>http://metachat.org/index.php/2011/10/12/elizabeth_and_hazel#c587112</link>
        </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
